child support

Related Topics


Confidential Adoptions

A more modern and more positive term that is used to describe what has been traditionally called "closed adoptions."

Question: Could someone please rationalize what agencies call "confidential adoption" so it makes sense? By definition, a closed adoption or "confidential adoption," must first require taking away the rights of a child to know his/her identity in order to assure another person (a parent) that the child will not find out who they are until at least adulthood, if ever. I'm not talking about revealing parents' identities to the general public; I'm only talking about their son or daughter retaining their rights to their own heritage. My question is How can this practice be ethically justified? Thank you for your thoughts. Good answers so far. As suspected, there is no real justification for "confidential adoption". It's disappointing that there are people who believe that adoptees should accept closed adoption on the grounds that they could have been aborted instead, thus leaving them deserving of fewer rights than those not adopted. Permanently closed adoption simply is not fair to the adoptees. Keep speaking our truths until we are understood.

Answer: Its early so bare with me..... It CAN'T be rationalized. Who are the agencies to be "promising" this in the first palce?!?! Anyone can start a non profit agency why is the state allowing complete idiots to have the control of someones heritage and ancestry?!?! Look at Seymour Kurtz ( had numerous agencies shut down for child trafficking, nevertheless he's still practicing. http://www.babybrokerwatch.com ) look at jennalee ryan ( kicked out of numerous states and lost her liscence in a couple of states for child trafficking and trying to sell "pre-made" embryos w/ "perfect" qualities ( eugenics ) yet she just moved states and is practicing again. The list goes on and on, yet the states DON'T CARE ABOUT OUR INFORMATION. At least adoption agencies are required to keep it though there isn't a single law that I'm aware of that requires donor clincs to "keep" the vital records they're doing it on faith only. There IS NO RIGHT TO PRIVACY UPON SURRENDER in the entire nation. That is in every state, in every city across the United States of America. I don't know WHY my records are still sealed. Well, thats a lie, I do know why, i know that those who sealed them in the 30's in my state ( california ) were invovled w/ Georgia Tann, they had a black market baby. They wanted records sealed. They got records sealed. Its unfortunate that a few people have the power to unseal or seal them at their discretion. A Closed adoption is all that happens these days. EVERY ADOPTEES RECORDS ARE SEALED. 6 states open them to the adoptees upon the age of majority. NONE of these states can legally promise any mother a right to privacy upon surrender. They have no ethical, legal or moral right to do this, yet they're doing it to thousands of children a year. This is where my passion against agencies "birthed" from. Of course since then it has developed and grown for other, signifigant reasons, but for now, this needs to be addressed. It will this July 2008 at the Annual State Legislatures Convention.

 


Confidential Adoptions Related Products and News