Two-State Action

Question: Two state solution: dead? Sorry to turn the topic away from the war in Gaza (not really) but I would like to post a small question, Do you think a two state solution is possible, and if so how would you implement it? For those like me who believe it is not going to happen what would you suggest?-- please be polite. For example: I think the best course of action would be for Israel to integrate the West Bank in a similar way it has done with the Golan. This would include giving residency for the Palestinians living in the area and a path to citizenship for those who want it. Final note- no rude or offensive comments, this includes insulting Arabs, Jews, any religion , Palestinians, Zionists, Israelis, or anyone else. If you are unable to do that, please post somewhere else hopeless, next time could you answer the question? Paperback-- I specifically asked for things not like that...

Answer: It cannot be done. Groups like Hamas want Israel gone they will never accept becoming part of Israel. In all honesty they would be smart if they did they would easily become a majority and take over the country quite easily and peacefully. If there is to be an Israel there needs to be a two state solution. The only other alternative is expulsion which is not a viable or humane one.

Question: two example of how the west has two face? one is Turkey, second is Israel. please compare between two states how they deal with terrorism? which state has legitimate action? and which state has stoped by the West, led by the US? I'm not accuse the west, I'm just shame on my government that is AK Party government.

Answer: You make the mistake of thinking that Palestine and Turkey don't make their own decisions. They do, Palestine just doesn't want peace, if they did they would have taken the peace 'deal' that Clinton offered them. Are you telling me you want to live like Israel and Palestine do?< Because THEY do it then it's OK for Turkey to do it? Hummmm

Question: If I say, "time has only two states, Future & Past only Present is not the time" what would you say? Present is actualy an active factor, not time itself, like a sharp blade it cuts the future into slices of past. It keeps everything in motion in a static and motionless ocean of time. Without the prsent none of the action is possible. Our soul holds the present we are alive otherwise dead. The present causes actions happening this is actualy the 4rth dimension not time.

Answer: I would say firstly that time is a made-made concept, It doen't exist in nature or space. It is an invention which helps us to function, In all that we do. Time has no state but of that in the present. Because the past has ceased to exist and the future is yet to exist. So in answer to your statement I would say time is a figment of our collective imagination and doesn't actually exist at all.

Question: Is California the future of Texas and Arizona? Those states need action now or else they will sink like the Golden State under a sea of illegals and their anchor babies and all the strains that they put on the states resources. As these two states are red states are the Republicans in these states doing anything about this? Its too late for California as the Democrats in the state like the votes, the illegals "American" children give them.

Answer: Texas running on borrowed time, illegals and their kids have swamped Texas just as much as California, Houston has the most illegals of any city in America (even more than LA!) and Arizona's population is growing so fast I think the people in AZ forget that Arizona is located in a desert and is lacking in a little thing called "water" ? The Republicans in these states don't care, more people = more money, to them until it collapses through. Oklahoma is probably the only Republican state in the region trying to stop its self from turning into Mexifornia. Edit: Illegals are the problem they are putting strains on the states resources and infrastructure so the prop has to pay for more of them and it can't so it has to cut back, if there was no illegals there would be no problem with the prop. Illegals destroyed California, they also have no right to be there, remember illegal immigration is AGAINST the law.

Question: STATE OF ORIGIN CAN SUM1 SUMMARISE THIS PLS? hey guys i need help can some one summarise this please just in few bullet point will kinda do more will be great. .... In 1966, Ken Thornett (a 1963 Kangaroo tourist) became the first to publicly push for Origin style matches. Thornett, in his book Tackling Rugby wrote that, "Annual inter-state fixtures are suffering a slow death." Thornett was convinced that if no action was taken "Queensland's role will be merely secondary." "Inter-state matches could be revitalised by allowing former Queenslanders to play for their state. The present imbalance of playing strength between the two states is an embarrassment all round." Thornett stated that if the Sydney based players were mixed "together with the best of the current crop of Queenslanders, they would make NSW battle every inch of the way. If our administrators intend to persist with inter-state fixtures then it would be only fair to all concerned that transferred Queenslanders be declared eligible to play for their home state." Thornett's prediction of Queensland's decline had become reality by the late 1970s. In 1977 the NSWRL refused to host any inter-state matches, and the following season consigned the contest to suburban Leichhardt Oval. After 96 points were racked up against Queensland in the three-match 1979 series, Lawrie Kavanagh resurrected the Origin concept in the Courier-Mail. Kavanagh wrote that Queenslanders "are getting sick and tired of hearing and reading about Queensland losing its best players to Sydney year in and year out. Even the most ardent Queensland supporter is accepting the fact that Queensland is not in a position to beat NSW under the present one-way traffic to Sydney. A major suggestion now is a state-of-origin series." The Maroons' problem was only partially that they were facing former Queenslanders in the NSW team - the 1979 Blues team had less than a handful - what they really needed was access to the Queensland players right across the Sydney clubs. The head of the QRL, Ron McAuliffe, was reluctant to take up the Origin concept. He placed confidence in the future of Queensland in his rising youngsters, headed by Wally Lewis and Mal Meninga. He was also uncomfortable with rewarding 'disloyal' Queenslanders resident in Sydney with a maroon jersey. However, by the end of 1979, a chance meeting with Queensland journalist Hugh Lunn turned McAuliffe around. Lunn again put the Origin suggestion to McAuliffe. They examined the pitfalls including what would happen to inter-state rugby league if Queensland lost the Origin contest as well, would Sydney clubs release players, and would these 'ex-Queenslanders' even want to wear a Maroon jersey? Ultimately, they agreed there was no real risk as inter-state games could sink no lower. A simple statement from Lunn - that has proven time and again to be true of Origin - eventually convinced McAuliffe: "There is no such thing as an ex-Queenslander." McAuliffe though still backed his young players to come through in 1980. He told Lunn that only if Queensland lost the first two matches would he push the ARL for an Origin contest in the 'dead-rubber'. Ultimately, McAuliffe's faith in Lewis and Meninga would deliver the goods, but not in 1980. NSW duly won the first two matches. Immediately after the second game (May 28) the news was released that a 'State of Origin' match would be played on July 8 at Lang Park. McAuliffe confidently predicted a sell-out crowd of 35,000 and the resurgence of Queensland rugby league, while Sydneysiders called it a non-event. Thanks largely to the efforts of ARL Chairman Kevin Humphreys, the Sydney clubs released their Queensland players and the contest took place. He also ensured the match was treated as an ARL selection trial - providing an extra incentive for players of Queensland origin to make themselves available. Eighty years after The Cynic's first suggestion for players to return home for inter-state matches, State of Origin had arrived.

Answer: Is this your homework from school? I don't think it is allowed to have it done by somebody with a degree in history. But it is sure smart trying. ;-)

Question: Does relocating for a job qualify as hardship for my HOA to let me rent out my townhome in the previous state? Had to relocate to the east coast as my husband got a job out here. However, I still own a townhouse in California. My HOA wants a hardship letter to allow me to rent out my place which I find crazy since I (or technically the bank) own the house. Given the current economic crisis, the home is worth half the amount it was when I orginally bought it. Can rent it out for less than the mortgage (even have an interested tenant), but this beats selling it at this time due to down market and there's no way I can cover that loss at this time. My question is, can the HOA dictate this as I am the one that owns the property? Does relocating count as a hardship (as there's no way I can live in two states or support two mortgages just to appease the HOA Gods)? Is there legal action I can take if they decline my hardship letter? Any information would be much appreciated. Thank you so much in advance for your time and advise - happy new years to all!

Answer: The move is not a hardship. It did not happen to you, you decided that was what you wanted. Hardships are events beyond your control. Your letter needs to focus on your financial situation. Keep in mind they might prefer a foreclosure, a vacant unit can be better then terrible tenants and a absentee landlord. You might want to tell them you will let them see criminal back ground checks and credit reports for your tenant.

Question: Obama Supporters, What two States have Federal Law Suit briefs ready for filing at the end of August ?????? What happens when your nominee is stopped with a Federal Injunction to move forward.? and 90 days of trial time is taken up in the DNC defending there action to disenfranchise minority voters?,, This puts you way to the end of October,, and can you say what that will do to your chances,,? This is a 4 part question,, Shiloh this has nothing to do with your primary,, that is a mute point,, this is a Federal Filing for disenfranchising monority voters. Two complete seperate dealings,,, Sniper unless your name is on the action you have no premise to see anything. this is a privite matter being handled by a number of attorneys for privite citizens in both states,

Answer: The State of Denial and a State of Disbelief...

Question: Why is thatIs AIPAC ( the Zionist lobby)is losing steam? I heard that George Soros is leaving away American Zionists. From Fortune Magazine : On its face, a drive to force public pension funds to halt investment in companies operating in countries believed to be sponsors of terrorism - primarily Iran - is in full swing. Presidential candidates John McCain and Mitt Romney support it. Legislation is being introduced in Congress and five states, including California. And on March 12, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the powerful pro-Israel lobby known as AIPAC, launched similar campaigns in ten states. But the three-year-old divestment movement has had only "limited success" so far, admits lead advocate Christopher Holton of the Center for Security Policy, a conservative think tank in Washington, D.C. Not a single state has passed legislation, and only two state funds have taken any action

Answer: let's hope so...AIPAC has already helped pushed this country into 2 wars and we sure don't need to put any countries welfare above our own.

Question: If Israel is strategically so important, Why is AIPAC ( the zionist lobby) losing steam? Even George Soros is leaving away American Zionists. I found this on Fortune Magazine : On its face, a drive to force public pension funds to halt investment in companies operating in countries believed to be sponsors of terrorism - primarily Iran - is in full swing. Presidential candidates John McCain and Mitt Romney support it. Legislation is being introduced in Congress and five states, including California. And on March 12, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the powerful pro-Israel lobby known as AIPAC, launched similar campaigns in ten states. But the three-year-old divestment movement has had only "limited success" so far, admits lead advocate Christopher Holton of the Center for Security Policy, a conservative think tank in Washington, D.C. Not a single state has passed legislation, and only two state funds have taken any action

Answer: Recent scandals have put a (small) dent in AIPAC's power but they are still VERY powerful. There's a similar Israel-divestment movement in the U.S. that has had limited success. The first answerer's 'obsession with hating Israel' comment is part of the problem; people are turned off by that kind of emotional attempt to cut off any discussion of these issues. Problem is, one effort is based on conscience and concern for human rights, one is based on the power of money to control politics. Which do YOU think will win?

Question: Mayors, Legislators arrested in New Jersey corruption probe? Two Mayors and two state legislators are among 11 public officials arrested in New Jersey as past of a corruption investigation, the U.S. attorney's office in Trenton announced Thursday. Prosecutors says the state officials accepted cash bribes- ranging from $1,500 to $17,500 at a time- from insurances brokerage and roofing with public contracts. Corruption!!!!!! Corruption!!!! Coruption!!!!! do you think that, they believe that the nature of their bribe an insignificant need? or as we know that Bribery is the crime of giving or recieving something of value to influence official action. both person giving and recieving the bribe are guilty of bribery............ I want your opinion on this.....and tell me how you feel if you its fair for this mayors to take our money..........

Answer: plain greedy this is what happens when money leads you

Question: My fiance gave me a promise ring and then proposed over a year ago now. At the time we lived in two states? He was constantly talking about us getting married but wanted us to find a house together first. He couldn't wait for us to be together as a family and not be separated any longer. He has two boys and so do I. Two, age 17, one age 16 and one age 14. I got hired on at the same business he works at and my boys and I moved. My fiance and I have been looking for a home while currently renting two apartments to accommodate all six of us. We've been renting now for approx. nine months. The last few months my finance has not mentioned our engagement or getting an engagement ring. He has not even mentioned getting married. Lately, he seems uninterested about looking for a house. He tells me he loves me, yet, his actions are different from the past. Little things have changed. I feel anxious, nervous, and insecure about the entire situation. I love him more now than in the past, but I am afraid that he has or is changing his mind? I also wonder if the stress of four teenagers has been sucking the life out of both of us? Additionally, I wonder if going from seldomly seeing each other when we were living in two seperate states to not only living together but working together too....is too much?

Answer: Well, he's getting the benefit of having you without having to make it legal. Promise rings mean nothing, you know.

Question: Is AIPAC ( the Zionist lobby) losing steam? From Fortune Magazine -- On its face, a drive to force public pension funds to halt investment in companies operating in countries believed to be sponsors of terrorism - primarily Iran - is in full swing. Presidential candidates John McCain and Mitt Romney support it. Legislation is being introduced in Congress and five states, including California. And on March 12, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the powerful pro-Israel lobby known as AIPAC, launched similar campaigns in ten states. But the three-year-old divestment movement has had only "limited success" so far, admits lead advocate Christopher Holton of the Center for Security Policy, a conservative think tank in Washington, D.C. Not a single state has passed legislation, and only two state funds have taken any action

Answer: AIPAC is the most influential group on our government, even more so than the citizens. the US gives Israel $3 billion a year to do whatever it wants with, primarily for defense. a major reason we are in this war right now is the Zionists. if the AIPAC is losing steam, good for the rest of the world including U.S. citizens.

Question: What Do You Think About My Responsibility Report So Far...??? THIS IS WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN ON MY RESPONSIBILITY REPORT SO FAR...PLEASE TELL ME HOW YOU LIKE IT AND IF YOU WOULD BE NICE ENOUGH TO HELP ME ADD SOME MORE TO IT BECAUSE I STILL NEED MORE. IF YOPU GET INFORMATION OFF THE INTERNET PLEASE WRITE THE LINKS BECAUSE MY TEACHER SAY WELL FAIL IF WE DONT DO THE BIOGRAPHY ON THE SOURCES...PLEASE AND THANK YOU!!! HERES MY ESSAY... Responsibility Responsibility is doing what you are relied on to do and completing a job that you have started. There are also many other types of responsibility. One type of responsibility is moral responsibility. Moral Responsibility is actions and their consequences in social relations. Another type of responsibility is social responsibility. Social Responsibility is a doctrine that claims that an entity whether it is state, government, corporation, organization or individual. There are many other types besides the two stated but they are all important parts of life. this isnt all of it but ist what i have written so far... THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO IS HELPING!!!! P.S. AM I DOING GOOD FOR A 12 YR. 7th GRADER???? ^^ON THE DETAILS BEFORE THESE I MEANT TO SAY AM I DOING GOOD FOR A 12 YEAR OLD 7TH GRADER!!!^^ This Is My Completed Report....WHAT DO YOU THINK??? Responsibility Responsibility is doing what you are relied on to do and completing a job that you have started. There are also many other types of responsibility. One type of responsibility is moral responsibility. Moral Responsibility is actions and their consequences in social relations. Another type of responsibility is social responsibility. Social Responsibility is a doctrine that claims that an entity whether it is state, government, corporation, organization or individual. There are many other types besides the two stated but they are all important parts of life. There is also personal responsibility which means having responsibility for your family, your debts, and other personal stuff. There is also responsibility to yourself which means to follow your goals, values, and dreams to achieve them. (Continued) Responsibility is an important part of everyone’s life and the only way you can succeed in life is by being responsible. Whenever someone is not responsible they can’t keep up with their stuff and forget everything which causes them to lose their jobs, friends, and everything else that is most important to them. If it was up to me, everyone would be responsible because that would make everything better for everybody, once everyone starts being more responsible, the world will be better. There will be less crime, fights, wars, and other things that cause problems in the world. I hope that once everyone notices what responsibility can do for them they will start to be more responsible and help other people understand more about responsibility.

Answer: This sounds great! You are off to a good start. Don't forget individual (or personal) responsibility to your family, your debts, etc. Also, your responsibility to yourself to always follow your goal, values and so on. Give each type of responsibility a paragraph and illustrate it with examples. It looks to me that your report will earn you an outstanding grade. Keep up the great work!

Question: Will President Barack Hussein Obama bring Peace to Palestine? Not sure. I heard that he is a big Israel Supporter like his counterpart former U.S. president George W. Bush. He(Obama) has disagreed with the current Israeli government over Jewish settlements in Palestinian territories. These settlements are what make the palestinians angry which is no wonder why palestinians turn to Extremism. The only theyre will ever be peace is with the two state solution which is to remove all jewish settlements from palestinian territories, palestinians get a fair share of Jerusalem, an End to Israeli Occupation of Palestinian territories, to bring down the wall dividing West bank and Jewish Israel, and to get their freedom such as being able to travel to Israel to work, study or other important reason, more fairer treatment by Israel, Israel to allow aid in. All these things mentioned is what the palestinians want and what Hamas would also like. To give an Idea, Hamas's real goal is not to destroy Israel but its to restore the freedom that they believe that Palestinians deserve. If they get all this then their hate of Israel will go away. anyway back to the point, Pres. Obama has said that he will work hard to get the two-state solution accomplished. His actions don't even state that so far, but we will really find out before the end of his first term or later on. He wants Israel to stop settlement building activity in palestinian territories which Israel probbaly still is not doing. Also at the same time he keeps sending Money and/or military supplies to Israel which will keep Israel strong enough to keep doing injustice to poor palestinians. And for sure because of that there will be more fighting between both sides until the palestinians are finally able to live in peace and security. Obama should encourage Israel to stop their injustice toward poor palestinians somehow even if its just by burning an Israeli flag or closing down Israeli embassies here in the U.S. . If you guyz were the palestinians you would know that the palestinians are the ones that are suffering more not Israel out of the conflict. If you think that Israel is the victim rather than the poor palestinians living in the worst conditions ever then that is like saying its OK if another country invades US(USA) and builds settlements here n tortures us n prevents us from going to work somewhere else if there are no Jobs in our country(U.S.A) and also wants to colonize us.

Answer: but the palestinians and their supporters have made it clear they don't want peace the palestinians and their supporters will not be happy while israel survives israel are the obstacle to peace...their very existence is but they are not the aggressors....muslim arab states have been attacking israel since its earliest days

Question: Christians: What are your thought and Justification of Israel's occupation? Is it justifiable for "God's Chosen people" to imprison 1.5 million people in the Gaza Strip. That's about 360 km of land. Simply put, it's a very cramped place where Palestinians are blocked with little if any aid reaching them: http://www.theglobaleducationproject.org… Now, please don't give me the BS of "They have a right to defend themselves from Hamas" Give me a break, It sound like a mindless broken record. Every country has a right to defend, but "hamas" is firing bottle rockets. Since 2000, 7 people have been killed in Israel. Hundreds of Thousands in Palestines dead including children in UN schools and hospitals. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE50… Here is the sequence: Hamas fires rockets, (No israeli casualties), Israel retaliates with bombarding Gaza into rubble (hundreds dead)....This has been going on for the past decade. That is disgusting. Defending one self does not mean disrupting all aid, building settlements, stealing most fertile land from Palestinians, and oppression. Most of all, it doesn't mean bombing the hell out of civilian population and saying it's defending it's self. If Israel wants a two-state "peaceful" solution, then why continue to build settlements in east Jerusalem where the future Palestinian capital will be if the solution is accepted. My Question is for the Christians, why is their so much support for Israel's inhumane acts of building settlements amongst other things, when the majority of citizens in Tel-Aviv and other places are in support of a two-state solution and peace in Palestine and against the Government's action? For those of you in the Israeli Government's support: is it the lack of knowledge and have very little clue of what's going on, or are you misinterpreting your bible to justify Israel's actions, or just listening to the media's interruptions to Justify such actions? Isn't it contradictory to support an oppressive regime rather then the opinion of the people. Contradictory to the bible as we are suppose to be against the one who oppresses, jews went through the same hardship that Palestinians are going through right now. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsMjVp9IR… See for yourself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0T3jMRNw… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC-nYroSg… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKM2xNRHw… How are protests in Tel-Aviv, Arab Propaganda?? How old are you people? LMAO. BTW, Tel-Aviv is the second-largest city in Israel....sigh....

Answer: One day whole world, all religious groups, leave alone the Christians will follow the truth, ignore the falsehood i-e Israel.

Question: hey intelligent help needed..!!!? actually i am 13 nd in our school mock pariliament goes on.. i have been selected nd i ' ve been given the country 'uk'.... my agenda is.. * foreign policies of the country... *reforms in united natins i.e how it can be more democratic *conflicts and action to be taken.. (israel and palestine) and a two state solution,,, if the solution can take place then how.. nd the consequences of the solution... i know guys it is difficult.. but will be really thankful if anybody can help... thanks missy..!

Answer: Welcome to the United Kingdom & Internet Research. You can start your journey by visiting the following websites: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications… http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0108078.h… http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/ This sites will have all of the raw information you need to answer the questions assigned. Good luck!

Question: In the final analysis do we obey God or man ? That is the question now facing Netenyaho on the two state solution !!! Obama will now pressure Israel into a two state solution against the Word of God [bible] !!! ABRAHAM HEADS THE CHOSEN NATION Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee: and I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: and I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed. —Genesis 12:1-3 (See also Genesis 17:1-8 and Genesis 22:16-18) THE NATION TO BE A SPECIAL PEOPLE UNTO GOD For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth. — Deuteronomy 7:6 THE CHOICE HAS PLEASED THE LORD For the LORD will not forsake his people for his great name’s sake: because it hath pleased the LORD to make you his people. —I Samuel 12:22 The prophet Zechariah said that God will defend Israel and Jerusalem. God will destroy the nations that come against Jerusalem, even though all the nations of the earth be gathered against it. Jerusalem will be the center of world attention and military action: “Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem. and in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it” Zechariah 12:2,3 “And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.” Zechariah 12:9.

Answer: The Bible never says that Israel will sign the peace treaty "willingly." I believe they will be "forced" or pressured in some way to sign it. But, it WILL be signed. It has been written. So, "unlabeled" you believe in evil, but you don't believe in God?

Question: Should we boycott Israel now that Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman are in power? These two won't agree to a two state solution, recognize a Palestinian state, end violence, abide by previous agreements and laws- like settlements, right of return borders, etc. Liberman: • In 2001, following his own confession, Lieberman was found guilty of beating a 12-year-old boy. As part of a plea bargain, Lieberman was fined 17,500 shekels and had to promise never to hit young children again. • In 2004, Lieberman's 21-year-old daughter Michal set up a consulting firm, which received 11m shekels from anonymous overseas sources. Lieberman, according to the police, received more than a 2.1m-shekel salary from the company for two years of employment. In addition, according to an investigation by Haaretz, he allegedly received additional severance pay – amounting to hundreds of thousands of shekels – in 2006 and 2007, while he was minister of strategic affairs and deputy prime minister. According to Israeli law, this is illegal. • Lieberman is an ex-member of Meir Kahane's party, Kach, which was outlawed due to its blatantly racist platform. Moreover, his views towards Arabs do not appear to have changed over the years. In 2003, when reacting to a commitment made by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to give amnesty to approximately 350 Palestinian prisoners, Lieberman declared that, as minister of transport, he would be more than happy to provide buses to take the prisoners to the sea and drown them there. • In January 2009, during Israel's war on Gaza, Lieberman argued that Israel "must continue to fight Hamas just like the United States did with the Japanese in the second world war. Then, too, the occupation of the country was unnecessary." He was referring to the two atomic bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. • Lieberman does not live in Israel according to its internationally recognised borders, but rather in an illegal settlement called Nokdim. Legally speaking, this would be like US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton residing in Mexico and UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband living on the Canary Islands. http://www.counterpunch.org/gordon032620… Besides being a card carrying terrorist, he has proposed a loyalty oath for Arab Israelis who wish to be or remain citizens, which means citizenship can be revoked for those not deemed to be in full support of Israel's policies, etc. You aren't allowed to criticize the government lest you put your citizenship in jeopardy?? Somebody please remind me why they are called the only democracy in the Middle East and why do we support them?? Does this remind anyone of anything? * Also problematic is that they are swearing loyalty to a state that only really guarantees the safety, security and rights of Jews. The Declaration of the Establishment of Israel speaks to Jews. It does mention that it will ensure the rights of others, but all the talk of the natural right of Jews to the land and justice based on Israel’s prophets, etc are kind of a slap in the face to aforementioned non-Jewish inhabitants. Why would or should they swear allegiance to that? To agree to that is to deny one’s own God-given rights as though God gave rights and land to Jews and they will generously grant you some of it – if “security” (read: from the whim of an 18 year old soldier to actual terrorist threat) warrants it. 2. He is also the guy who said this: "It would be better to drown these prisoners (~11,000 people!!) in the Dead Sea if possible, since that's the lowest point in the world." (Avigdor Lieberman, 7 July 2003) This is the rule rather than the exception for this guy. He is openly for ethnic cleansing where other government officials in recent years have only made veiled threats and cloaked action in some well-meaning and acceptable term like "security measures." And this: "At the end of the Second World War, not only the criminals were executed at the Nuremberg Trials, but also those who collaborated with them. I hope that this will be the fate of the collaborators in this house." (May 2006- Lieberman talking about Arab Knesset members who negotiate with Hamas)

Answer: Sounds like you don't like the Arabs getting a dose of their own medicine.

Question: Was the Republican Party totally responsible for the early voting in Michigan and Florida? As we all know there is much disagreement on what to do about these two states and whether or not their votes should count for nomination of the Presidential candidate. Both Democratic candidates agreed not to campaign in these states because of the action that had been taken and signed the agreement. One tried to obey the rules while the other disregarded them, and now the states want to be counted as they are. Revoting would have made this fair to all concerned. Did the Republican Party force the early voting date on the Democratic Party? If you think they did, please state how they did it, why they did it, etc. Was this earl.y date movement led by the Democratic Party and allowed by the opposing party? Did the Democratic Party expect to ignore the DNC's directives and still be seated? Are rules made to be broken?

Answer: The democrats have no one to blame but themselves for Michigan/Florida early voting. The state party machines went against DNC rules and are now suffering the consequences. Suck it up.

Question: Ariz. House approves concealed weapons bill(NO PERMIT REQUIRED)? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_concealed_… Will this, combined with the Firearms Freedom Acts, finally lead to untouchable recognition of the 2nd Amendment and the inherent right to bear arms? (for more on inherent rights, see http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles/si… and http://nz.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind… "PHOENIX – The Arizona House voted Thursday to make the state the third in the nation to allow people to carry concealed weapons without a permit, sending the governor a bill that would allow Arizonans to forego background checks and classes that are now required. The legislation, approved by the House 36-19 without discussion, would make it legal for most U.S. citizens 21 or older to carry a concealed weapon in Arizona without the permit now required. Currently, carrying a hidden firearm without a permit is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $2,500. Sen. Russell Pearce, a Mesa Republican who sponsored the measure, said last week that he added changes requested by Gov. Jan Brewer's office, an indication that she is likely to sign it. The governor can sign or veto the measure, or allow it to become law without action. If the legislation is enacted, Arizona would join Alaska and Vermont in not requiring permits to carry concealed weapons. Forty-five other states require permits for hidden guns, and two states — Illinois and Wisconsin — prohibit them altogether." @ Rico: dumb@ssTROLL, 'nuff said. @ tfoley: you haven't changed since the last question, dumb@ss TROLL

Answer: that makes me happy and my neck is not red! i hope it passes