Conjugal Conjugal Rights

Question: When can you abstain from voting with Robert's Rules? I am drawing up bylaws for an organization, and we have come to the issue of abstaining to vote. I have heard two sides: 1) Anyone can abstain from any vote at any time. 2) Since abstaining is basically a "no" vote, you can only abstain if you have a conflict of interest or were absent for a related vote. What's the bets call?

Answer: 1) is correct

Question: So if Obama is supposed to be breaking all these rules, why isn't anyone stopping him? Conflict of interest, racially picking judges, etc. If the Obama Administration is guilty of this, why hasn't anything been done about it? Why hasn't anyone stopped him? Why hasn't anyone blew whistles? so even Brian the Dog is saying non sense on here?

Answer: Because he's not breaking all these rules... The GOP are just politicking. Nothing more.

Question: conflict of interest with judge and attorney??? i recently went to court over custody of my daughter. her father got most everything in his favor and basically my life and my daughters was ordered to fit around his schedule. it seemed as though important information was being overlooked and judgements were being based with ridiculous reasoning, or none? anyways, i spoke with a new attorney to discuss reopening my case and she informed me that the judge who ruled our case and my ex's attorney share the same suite. also, the judge was retired and occasionally stands in on cases. i was told to file a complaint with the bar association, but is there anything to do to make a change in the rulings that have already been documented?? in addition to this, my attorney i just fired referred me to another judge/attorney who heard our case at one time, and has on several occasions not met my expectations and has made it seem as though each time we spoke we were meeting for the first time. this is the first time i have ever dealt with this type of situation, but i dont feel as though i was represented even decently? in the end (at our last court date) when i asked my attorney for an evidentiary hearing, she did not mention it to the judge and told me it was to late because the judge already made his ruling. i believe this is incorrect also. anything i can do about that? I feel as this whole case has been a joke to everyone except me!

Answer: The first thing you want to do is research. All states have "Rules of Professional Conduct" that all lawyers (judges included) have to abide by. The state bar association is who enforces the Rules of Professional Conduct but nearly every state has adopted those same rules into their Supreme Court Rules for more power against the those who break the rules. Once you've done your research there, the next step would be to dictate a letter of your experience, with as much detail as you can provide, to both your state's bar association and Judicial Commission. The Judicial Commission (or Committee) has complete authority over all judges. Both agencies should inquire and bring an investigation against the judge you've mentioned and it is possible that your judge could not only be reprimanded by the agencies but also criminally charged. The last and final step, and you will be able to do so, is appeal your trial based on the same argument you now have. You could possibly appeal with doing the above two steps, but the court will be much more likely to grant the appeal if they see you are exercising other remedies. Keep an eye on the judge and everyone else this time, if something doesn't seem right, have your attorney file a motion to recuse the judge - get ride of them. In conclusion, if what you're alleging is valid, I would not only go after the judge involved but the other party's attorney as well. Not only did the judge violate several provisions, in what you allege, but the councel for the other side did as well.

Question: Do you think there is a conflict of interest? I remember a few years back, Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks was in the process of signing Dennis Rodman, he didn't have much cap space and he was going to allow him to live on his estate in one of his guest houses as a perk....the NBA stepped in and said NO-NO! Of course Sidney Crosby lives at Mario's and Lemiuex is part of the Pen's ownership group. Should the NHL have an issue with this? Also....I consider myself a bit of a student of the salary cap and how it operates and it also made me think of ways of circumventing the cap AND I know of at least a couple of people who got jobs within an organization (or at the arena) BECAUSE they were friends of a player on that team. Should the NHL have an issue with this? Does the NHL have a rule in the CBA pertaining to "favours?" For instance, a big market team....say the Leafs as an example, want to sign a player for 6 MM per season, however they only have 5.5MM in cap space, is there anything preventing them from offering this contract................ 5.5MM per season Older brother gets a position as the Director of Suite Sales at Air Canada Center for 150,000 per year Younger brother gets some position as a gopher, towel boy, laundry aide...some BS position for 50,000 per year Sister gets a job as some media relations Friend gets a job as whatever.........you get the picture While I am sure that this stuff can't be actually put into a contract, is there anything preventing a team from letting the player stay rent free in their "guest house" or giving that family member an "executive of executive to the assistant of executive suites" as a contract "perk?" Leafs Fan- Apparently he has his own living quarters at Mario's house.....I was told that he would often babysit for them (LOL) but Mario's kids are starting to get old enough now......in fact, one is off to Shattuck-St-Mary's this Fall so.... J.O......good point witht the College Scouts......get them some nice 3000$ suits, no show jobs for their Dad, etc....LOL No show jobs.....kind of has a mafioso tone to it. BTW.....not France, just English....neighbourhood, flavour, rumour, favour......it's you crazy Americans that do it wrong LOL.......seriously, proper English (British)........just the way I learned here in Canada....I will spell it both ways though. Spell chack on here keeps trying to fix it! Greg- Cindy Crosby? Who is that? Do you mean Cindy Crawford? Bring in the X-Files to investigate the big conspiracy.

Answer: So is "favour" France for "favor"....Good off the wall Question bOb. I guess there is really no good answer for that. If it can't be contracted I'd say it can't be honored, but then again that doesn't mean it can't be done. It reminds me of the stories and experiences I've herd/had from College scouts. The offers and butter-ups that a team uses to try to get a player to say yes, kind of reminds me of when I try to convince the wife to give it up with my used car salesman antics.

Question: Why do accountants or CPAs give their clients investment advice? Is there a conflict of interest? I am a financial advisor & have been advising for a few years. I have a BS & MBA degree & have taken a number of accounting classes above my requirement; however, I rarely advise clients on tax issues or if I do I tell them to verify with their tax professional. In my career, I have noticed that a lot of clients take investment advice from their tax preparer (rather they be a CPA or not). The advice they give in many cases is down right wrong or focused on the wrong thing. Isn't there a rule or law that states that attorneys or CPAs can only advice clients on investments in a limited capacity if they are not licensed to do so? Are they also required to notify the client that they are not licensed to make professional reccomendations on investments? I have had a lot of business killed by accountants that are really unqualified to give portfolio recomendations.

Answer: If they're giving recommendations as an individual then that's not illegal or immoral. It's only if they try to cash in on their financial training to make money recommending investment choices that there's a conflict. If it's just two guys talking about investing then how do you restrict that? People assume that accountants know what they're doing because they work with money - why is that strange? A professional recommendations on investing means that you're paying the person for the advice. If it's your accountant that you pay to do your taxes and you ask for some stock tips, he's not doing anything wrong.

Question: Did you know A.G. Holder worked for a lawfirm that defends Gitmo terrorists. See any conflict of interest here? law firm, which represents 17 Yemenis currently held at Gitmo. From the C & B website: "The firm represents 17 Yemeni nationals and one Pakistani citizen held at Guantánamo Bay. The Supreme Court will soon review the D.C. Circuit’s ruling that ordered the dismissal of a number of habeas petitions filed by Guantánamo detainees; some of our clients are petitioners in the Supreme Court case. We expect to play a substantial role in the briefing. We also plan to petition the Supreme Court to hear our Pakistani client’s appeal from the D.C. Circuit’s order dismissing his case." WHERE IS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ON THIS? If this happened under Bush this would be a top story. http://boards.history.com/topic/Current-… http://mortgagegrapevine.com/thread/?thr… Eric Holder was a senior partner at the firm

Answer: This remains part of the extreme ABSURDITY of this Administration. WHY are there ALWAYS some connection between Obamas "people" and some "questionable" association or "improper conduct" from their past. Thousands of qualified people in this nation and almost ALL of them have some clandestine connection to EACH other or part of Obamas past. Anyway, your assessment is accurate. This is clearly a conflict of interest, but unless Fox News has the time to follow it ( they have MORE than enough now with Obamas socialist Administration ) it will be IGNORED and forgotten.

Question: What to do if the judge in your child support visitation case is bias? here's the story a friend of mine has a child with a women who works for the family court every time he goes before the judge she works for the judge sides with her and doesn't listen to the friends side before making unfair rulings. The friend asked the judge if him being over the case was a conflict of interest and the judge preceded to rule an outrageous amount of child support. Is this judicial misconduct? He can't afford an attorney he barely makes child support it's over half his paycheck. What can he do besides bend over and take it.

Answer: I can tell you exactly what happened, in short he pissed off the judge. You do not question a Judge, especially if you are not a lawyer yourself. See what your friend doesn't understand is that there are set amounts given by the state for the amount of child support a person can legally be obligated to pay. Usually for one child it is between 20-25%, but this is Gross pay, not net! So let's say you get paid $1000 a week. Then about $300 of that goes toward social security, federal, and state taxes, so now you have $700, but then you have to pay for your health insurance which is $100 a week, so now you have $600 a week take home pay. 25% of 1000 is $250, so take $600 subtract $250 and you get $350 a week! I know it sucks but those are the rules, it is based on Gross, not Net pay. And it is at the Judges discretion on whether to give the 20 or 25 percent, or somewhere in between. The only way your friend has any case at all against the judge is if the amount ordered exceeded the limit set by the state. Like if the state law sayd 20-25% and your friend was ordered to pay 40%, then there would be a case against the Judge for an unfair ruleing. But from the sounds of it he went into the Judge's court room and mouthed off and basically asked the Judge if he knew what he was doing, and then called his ethics into question, which is possibly the most sacred thing to a Judge. So, the Judge gave him the maximum....I would tell your friend to kiss the Judge's ass next time and he MIGHT not get the maximum, if the Judge is in a good mood.

Question: Is it OK for a gay judge to rule on gay marriage ban? Isn't it a bit of a conflict of interest to have an openly gay judge rule on the gay marriage ban in California. Judges are supposed to be totally unbiased when they rule on a case. Would it have been OK if a devout Catholic had ruled on this case?

Answer: There does seem to be a perception of bias. All gays would benefit from this successful appeal. Either in being able to marry or to know their status is raised by having that right. A heterosexual judge on the other hand, would be less motivated. His status would not raise or fall whichever way the decision went. Also it might be fair to say that while 95% of gays would support gay marriage it is approximately only about 50% of heterosexuals. Thus for political and practical reasons a homosexual judge would be much more inclined to prejudge the decision than a straight judge.

Question: So the White House Sez its OK for Wolfowitz to violate the ethics and rules of the World Bank along with? conflict of interest charges but this is not enough to be dismissed???????????? What does he have to do? Rob the place or kill everyone there? Now tell me that this Bush Administration is not corrupt? It seems pretty darn obvious to me!

Answer: The comments made by Condi Rice and Tony Snow in support of the Wolf just made me laugh my heart out. They said that the Wolf's mistakes were not "firable offenses". Putting these notion of "fireable offenses" in the context of banking rules, they seem to imply that if a bank employee had stolen a thousand dollars from the bank, he's not supposed to be fired. Only if he stole a million dollars does the offense qualify as "fireable". What is kind of rule is that?. A thief is still a thief just the same. It doesn't matter how little or how much he'd stolen. The Wolf's case is no different. No matter how little or how much he had done, it is still against the rules and regulations of the World Bank. It's still blatant corruption, plain and simple. It's better if Condi Rice and Tony Snow keep their mouths shut on the matter. They've got no right to tell how the World Bank should carry out its internal affairs. Both of them are not in any way connected with the bank.

Question: Why the absence of God for some, Is the existance of God possible? What are the deterrent factors in the creation of God, a God like personage to rule the world. Conflicts of interests, duality, divided races, nations, religions, classes and peoples? Your Thoughts.

Answer: An absence of morality, honour, virtue essential for Love and Peace to prosper create an absence of God or any God like Figure head. Extremism rages as a plague in the guise of atheism, feminism, homosexualism, racism and irreligiousness across the nations from the west sowing seeds of discontent amongst the aggrieved malcontents facilitating the legion in their crusade. It is a serious problem politicians and media fear broaching for the vitriolic backlash and sheer hatred emanating from the contingents of the aforementioned hateful group, now well organised and supported by the same said politicos and media barons. The same tools and platforms of voice are able to bring good news instead of bad, preach love and morality than indulgence of the symptomatic outcome of perversity, encourage religious unification than focus is not promote invasive wars and massacres of defamed and defenceless peoples and their nations. Yet they choose not to. A small ineffectual group of incompetents have decided there is no profit in peace and the world condemned thereby for the sins and impregnable wilful stupidity of this self appointed cartel of evil. Implausible but horridly true.

Question: what prisons can you have conjugal rights in vic can you get married in prison?

Answer: In the United States in order to enjoy the conjugal rights in prison, a conjugal visit is give, a conjugal visit is a scheduled visit during which an inmate of a penal institution is permitted to have sexual intercourse with a visitor in a closely controlled setting. It is generally stipulated that this visitor be a spouse. The generally recognized basis for permitting such a visit is that, even though the inmate has lost their rights with incarceration, their spouse still has the right to enjoy sexual intimacy, and should not be required to divorce or commit adultery in order to enjoy conjugal rights.

Question: restitution of conjugal rights? my friend neha has been married last year after one month her husband forced her to take care of her parents but she refused because she was working .due to these circumstances she left her husband's home and sid that she won't come in that house and want to live saparetly.husband filed case for rastitution of conjugal rights under hindu marriage act 1955.is that lageally fair?

Answer: These links my help your friend.~ # he Indian Scenario on Restitution of Conjugal Rights: Stare ... The Indian Scenario on Restitution of Conjugal Rights: Stare Decisis and Beyond ... 'Restitution of Conjugal Rights' continues to be a matrimonial remedy in Indian Law. ... http://www.works.bepress.com/gautam_swarup/1 - Cached # Constitutional Validity of Restitution of Conjugal Rights ... Constitutional Validity of Restitution of Conjugal Rights: Scope and Relevance ... Constitutional Validity of Restitution of Conjugal Rights: Scope and ... http://www.works.bepress.com/adityaswarup/8 - Cached # India Sources of Muslim personal law as applied in India are Hanafi fiqh along with some resort to other schools, ... decrees of nullity, restitution of conjugal rights, judicial ... http://www.law.emory.edu/ifl/legal/india.htm - Cached

Question: my hubby is in US.I applied for restitution of conjugal rights and i got it.my mother-in-law lives in india.? my hubby is in US.I applied for restitution of conjugal rights and i got it.my mother-in-law lives in india.can i live with my mother-in-law until my hubby takes me back?and can i be provided with maintenance also?pls answer me

Answer: Where r u dwelling now? whether u got merit order or ex parte? your question shows u have not filed any application for maintenance Anyhow Mere getting order of RCR is not enough. You have to enforce the order by the ways mentioned in the sections Hindu Marrige and as per CPC for execution RCR will not work out if your husband living aboard Better prefer complaint under Domestic Violence Act before DV office, get 'Residential order' the same will be easy in DV complaint itself u can demand maintenance. if your MIL permits, u may reside along with u. even getting order for Restitution, you cannot enforce the same by compelling the spouse What's ur religion? age? his? do u have kids? why he deserted u? coz of interference of his parents? or any affairs? or misunderstandings? When he will come back? Do u hope will he come back? are required to say proper answer On the other hand the unenforceable Order of RCR for one year will entitle u to file Divorce against ur husband So choose the best

Question: Do any of the States of Australia have conjugal rights for prisoners?

Answer: not that i'm aware of. when my brother was in prison, we were confined to one area at all times during visitation. he was never given any privacy with my sister in law at any time. on some occasions she had to 'smuggle' money in to him, it wasn't easy because you are constantly monitored by one of the screws.

Question: can I apply for conjugal rights after my husband has served Divorce case on me?

Answer: In the USA, two consenting adults can do anything. Also, if you are separated and share a night of intimacy ? The day of separation starts over. So, lets say you have been separated for 3 months and have sex. At that point, your separation date is resent to day 0. However, in your country ? I don't know. Peace.

Question: What are conjugal rights? What are conjugal rights~is it anything to do with fairness in marriage?

Answer: Yes, it means that a husband should be able to have sex with his wife basically whenever he wants it (or vice versa). It is implied in the vows and in the institution of marriage itself. A woman, in particular, who holds herself back from her husband is breeching the wedding vows, in my opinion.

Question: Conjugal rights - Should legislatures allow husbands to demand them? A GWS regular asked some interesting questions, which provoked some very interesting answers. Rape in marriage is still legal in some countries. Some people believe that a man can't rape his wife, because they hold the view that a woman surrenders consent upon entering marriage and that conjugal rights denote a man's right to sex. As witnessed in an answer today some people believe that if sex isn't provided, the man has the right to "take it". Here is the answer I came across earlier today... "If a woman advertised herself as slut in the beginning then (sic) she has to fulfill her duties. If they are married couple, the man has the right to take what he signed up for. SEX" Should women be expected to fulfil her husbands conjugal rights, and if she doesn't, should he have the right to demand it?

Answer: No, I don't believe anyone has the right to *demand* anything of their partner. They have the right to question their partner's motivations and, ultimately to leave the relationship if their needs are not being met, but everyone is an individual person with their own personal and physical integrity. This applies to men as well as women. Say, for example, a man is in a high powered executive job when a couple marries, but shortly after the marriage has some sort of crisis (mental or physical) and decides to go into lawnmowing for a living. Should the spouse have the 'right' to demand he do something he no longer wants to, because he 'signed up for it'? At bottom, marriage is a legal contract, but there can't really be a workable emotional contract. That's just fantasyland, and best kept there. Cheers :-) PS: There was a Pookie clone here earlier. I starred the question.

Question: On Restitution of Conjugal Rights? I was harassed by my in-laws for various reasons, the primary one being on matters regarding handing over my salary to them. 7 months back I went back to my mother's house and I involved my widowed and dependent mother and other elders in the house to handle this situation by talking to my in-laws. However, this did not work. They were never open for discussion. Instead my husband filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights. There were a number of false allegations against me and my family in the petition. The most important one being that my mother prevented me from going to my matrimonial home. In the petition my husband prays the court to restore his conjugal rights on me and expressed his willingness to take me back. But this was clearly to protect him and his family from 498A. When I came forward to talk to him about this - he put 3 conditions (which have not been mentioned in the petition). Some of his conditions were to enter his house only after quitting my job and disowning my mother and all my relatives. We tried for mediation, it did not work. Now, my question is - since in his petition he has only stated that he wants me back as wife (conditions have not been added in the petition, that was only to harass me further), can I go to his house while the case is still pending in the court? Do I have to inform the court before i enter his house? What should I do if he / his family prevents me from entering the house? If I divorce, then he goes scottfree. He does not have to compensate me for all my losses and can marry again. I do not want men to take women for granted. Thanks to Mr.Vijay and all the others for answering my question. To the replier - Truth Alone, I am sorry to tell you that you are jumping into conclusions. My husband earns well enough to look after the family, my contribution is not required in the form of salary to take care of day to day expenses. I have promised them that I will be supportive to his family in buying a house, what more do they expect from me. Ok, I have also agreed to quit the job if my husband assures to take care of my mother who has no source of income, which he has denied. Do you mean to say that I leave my job, see that my mother is in road and live happily with my husband who will treat me like a slave?? I request you to please be more polite in your answers.

Answer: Enter his home your matrimonial home in presence of two or more respectable members of the society who will be eagerly ready to enter the witness box in the family court and state the truth about his misbehaviour, including his demands and conditions which otherwise he has not mentioned in his Petition for RCR. You need not wait for next date of the case to take permission of the Family Court for doing so, nor tell your learned lawyer this step you are taking as you don't know your lawyer may pass on this information to lawyer of the other party and spoil your game plan of collecting the relevant evidence of his misbehaviour towards you as well his not allowing your free entry in the matrimonial home rather imposing irrelevant conditions on you for doing so. Once this whole game plan as explained here by me is carried out and your husband is taken by surprise any act that he does as he had being telling you with regard to conditions for your entry to the matrimonial home etc being witnessed by independent witnesses he will be in real soup as his Petition for RCR will fail after these witnesses tell the real story about your husband to the court. His RCR petition fails that will be good evidence for getting order against him like protection order under the D.V. Act, as well for providing independent residence with all basic amenities for your stay and monthly maintenance for you.

Question: Restitution of conjugal rights? Dear Readers, My working wife left me two years back taking away the kid to her maternal home.Right now she has not filed any case such as 498a/DV.I tried everything to convince her to come back.Though i was never restricted to see my kid at their place but whenever i visit they insult me.My query is.. If i file for Restitution of conjugal rights what might be the legal implications on me and my parents as i am living with them.My bros are not living in joint family but younger brother lived with us three yrs back. As i think my situation with regard to meet my kid is even worse than what would have been if there would have been anything legal as that would hav allowed me to meet my kid anywhere, Thanks in anticipation.

Answer: Don't file restriction of conjugal rights. It takes long time and again you have to file divorce. Simply file divorce case, during court mediation if she willing to join with you take her with conditions otherwise proceed further. 498 A is criminal case they can file at any time. In case of 498 A get anticipatory bail from high court to avoid arrest.

Question: Can "restitution for conjugal rights" get me to be free from my rough wife? Our is not a registry marriage & have no photo of marriage but since 4 yrs we are known as a husband wife in our society.After 2 yrs of marriage she lodged 498/498a GDE with her parents. Afterthat our relationship came to a stabilty. But now 2 months ago she got admission for completing her madhyamik in some pvt. school & jsut after 2 weeks she went back to her father's home and convinced her parents that she's study is not going on well as I torchure her daily mentally & physically. Actually she are totally misguiding her parents I have criminal offence on her since one years. Now I found that she has a love affairs with another since one & half months. Then I proposed her to come in mutual divorce but she dosen't accept it and totally continue her affairs in full motion in my absence. Now in this regards can I file a case OF Restitution of Conjugal Rights. & if I do it can she claim for interim maintenance or go to police station showing reason for not residing with me becoz of torture and can that time she lodge F.I.R under 498/498A against me ? She is mentally little cracked and addicted to love affairs with another after our marriage also but protected it two times but now this is my out of control as there parents love her blindly. But I want to avoide to give her maintenance & afraid of 498/498A. Plz, Suggest me what is the right weapon now to pick at the the right time as I want to rid from her...

Answer: If this wife of your is having sexual relationship out of marriage than better collect evidence with regard to this and straight away file for dissolution of marriage on the ground of adultery, cruelty and desertion for more than 2 years. No use filling for RCR which will mean waist of time. Your marriage is already broken down and by the time your divorce case proceeds in the Family Court, there will be new ground available to you which is "irretrievable broken marriage" under which you case will be completely covering and give you benefit of obtaining divorce from her. As far the issue such as maintenance is concerned that you may have to pay her even if you file RCR. But it is not necessary she will get it just because she is not working now but if she has source to maintain herself she may not get any amount from you, this all depends on the source of income and capability of both parties. As far section 498A IPC, Dowry/Cruelty matter is concerned that she has no control as that is a State case against you and even if she compromise on this it will be left on the trail Court to dismiss that criminal complaint of High Court to quash the F.I.R.. No use waiting result for this criminal matter better go in for divorce straight away.