Early neutral evaluation provides parties in a dispute with an early and frank evaluation of the merits of their case by an objective, neutral evaluator. Like mediation, early neutral evaluation is confidential, voluntary, and does not eliminate other dispute resolution options. The evaluator is not a decision-maker.
Question: I have a question for people that know court rules and procedures....? I need to know how to request or how to get an early neutral evaluation. I need someone to upload maybe the form or format on the procedure I live in San Bernardino County California. Thank you.
Okay it is an unlimited civil case!
Answer: Neutral evaluation of what?
How can anyone answer a question without that information?
Richard
Question: Sam files a suit against Tia. They meet, and their attorneys present the case to a jury. The jury renders a no? Sam files a suit against Tia. They meet, and their attorneys present the case to a jury. The jury renders a non-binding verdict, after which the parties try to reach an agreement. This is
1. a mini-trial.
2. arbitration.
3. a summary jury trial.
4. early neutral case evaluation
Answer: 3
Question: help with business law? 3. Refer to Fact Pattern 3-1. If Nancy files a motion to dismiss, she is asserting that
a. Mack did not state a claim for which relief can be granted.
b. Mack’s statement of the facts is not true.
c. Mack’s statement of the law is not true.
d. Nancy suffered greater harm than Mack.
4. In Federated Corporation’s suit against Great Stores, Inc., the jury re turns a verdict in Federated’s favor. Great Stores files a motion asking the judge to set aside the verdict and begin new proceedings. This is a mo tion for
a. a judgment in accordance with the verdict.
b. a judgment on the pleadings.
c. a new trial.
d. judgment n.o.v.
8. In Harry’s suit against Irma, the parties meet before going to trial, and each party’s attorney argues the party’s case before the other party. A third party renders an opinion as to how a court would likely decide the dispute. This is
a. a mini-trial.
b. arbitration.
c. a summary jury trial.
d. early neutral case evaluation.
9. Molly files a suit against Nick. They meet, and each party’s at torney ar gues the party’s case before a judge and jury. The jury presents an advi sory ver dict, after which the judge meets with the parties to en courage them to set tle their dispute. This is
a. court-ordered arbitration.
b. early neutral case evaluation.
c. a mini-trial.
d. a summary jury trial.
Answer: 3. A 4.C 8.D 9.A
Question: A Few questions about law? 29. A dispute arises between Holly and Ira. They agree to arbitration, but before the dispute is resolved, Ira files a suit against Holly. The court will likely
a. hear the suit and then order the parties to arbitrate.
b. hear the suit without ordering the parties to arbitrate.
c. order relief without hearing the suit or compelling the parties to arbitrate.
d. order the parties to arbitrate.
30. Transnational Corporation and United Shipping, Inc., agree to a contract that includes an arbitration clause. If a dispute arises, a court having ju¬ris¬dic¬tion may
a. monitor any arbitration until it concludes.
b. order an arbitrator to rule in a particular way.
c. order a party to bring the dispute to court.
d. order a party to submit to arbitration.
31. American Computers, Inc., and MegaCorp ask an arbitrator to resolve their dispute, which involves a matter of significant public concern. This is a ground for a court to
a. review the merits of the dispute.
b. review the sufficiency of the evidence.
c. set aside the award.
d. none of the above.
32. World Tech Corporation and Global Supplies, Inc., have their dispute re¬solved in arbitration. The arbitrator meets several times with World Tech’s representatives to discuss the dispute outside the presence of Global’s representatives. If these meetings substantially prejudiced Global’s rights, this is a ground for a court to
a. review the merits of the dispute.
b. review the sufficiency of the evidence.
c. set aside the award.
d. none of the above.
33. Molly files a suit against Nick. They meet, and each party’s at¬torney ar¬gues the party’s case before a judge and jury. The jury presents an advi¬sory verdict, after which the judge meets with the parties to en¬courage them to settle their dispute. This is
a. a mini-trial.
b. a summary jury trial.
c. court-ordered arbitration.
d. early neutral case evaluation.
Answer: Read your text book!
