Legal Risk Adoptions

Question: Is it legal to have an abortion at 8 months? I would like to know if in the U.S. is it legal to have an abortion at 8 months when the child nor the mother are at risk? I'm a male so no, I am not considering abortion so don't give me any crap about how it's wrong and adoption etc., etc. I only want to know about the legality of the issue. I don't need to know your personal morals on the subject ok?

Answer: Illegal and endanger the mother as well!

Question: In need of legal advice..parents...housing situation...? I'm sixteen years old, I live in Illinois. After 20 years of marriage my parents are splitting. My dad has always been a crazy drunk, im surprised my mom lasted this long. Anyway, she now lives with her boyfriend, I live with my dad and brother. The parents are not yet divorced. Mom comes by to see my us every other day or so at least. But my dad is out of control. All he ever does is scream at me, and I can't stand it. I'm afraid of living with him. He would never physically hurt me but the verbal abuse is to much for me to handle. My mom understands, "its why she left." I could go live with my mom and her boyfriend, but I would then have to change schools, and I would feel uncomfortable, i've never met the guy and don't think he would like me living in his home. My wonderful best friend invited me to stay with her and her family, I love her mom to death and they would take me in in a moment. I think this would be best, to give myself a stable home enviroment and still attend highschool, where I am a sophmore. My mom has no problem with this, but shes afraid social services might find out and get her in trouble. So my question to you, can I move out, and stay with my friend and her family in my familys hard time, to seperate from my dad without legal issues like having to go through emancipation or adoption or risking getting my parents in trouble?

Answer: Personally, I would move as soon as I could. Keep working my butt off and get the best grades possible. I would be an ideal student. Then if the social worker did come. I would tell them that I needed to make the move so I could do well and possibly go to college. That the environment at my Dad's just wouldn't let me do this. And changing schools would hurt me scholastically. I really think you could pull this off. Especially if you can get the school to document your improvement. It would be hard, but then after graduation, you will be in a better position to fend for yourself. You could also consider a military career or enlistment to get the skills you need for a good job. Hey if you are going to have a good life, with the situation you are in, you're going to need to make a maximum effort. Good luck to you and God bless. In response to the ones who say that you can't make the decision. It is your life and if you are acting like an adult, you tend to get treated as one. By improving yourself in a responsible manner, it is likely the system won't take that away from you. Social services has problems we can't imagine and they most likely will not spend effort to put you in a worse situation. There are questions about the money for your support, but that is just to see who pays what to whom. You won't see any money, but if your friend's mom is willing, you can survive and thrive.

Question: What is your opinion about the abortionist ship? The abortionist ship of the Dutch NGO Women on Waves will arrive next Thursday to Valencia on its first campaign in Spain to reivindicate abortion as a woman's right and to defend the need to change the laws, which they consider obsolete within the boundaries of the European Union. The ship, which has its home port in The Netherlands and which has so far visited three European countries (Portugal, Ireland and Poland), has plans to perform pharmacological abortions (with tablets) in international waters sailing off Valencia Port, as explained by the promoters of this initiative in the Valencian region. Although up until now three women have already accepted to have an abortion in the ship, the intention of these associations and gynecologists is to carry out eight abortions to women pregnant of less than six weeks and six days, in a ship under Dutch flag, with the only authorisation of the women, against the legal requirements of the Spanish Law for the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy of 1985, which demands the authorisation of a medical doctor. The ship will go out into international waters, 30km away from the coast, two times to perform the abortions. One on Friday 17 and one on Monday 20, under the legal umbrella of the Dutch Laws, which it allows abortions of up to seven weeks of pregnancy with the pharmacological method, in international waters. On the ship there will be one member of the Spanish Association of Accredited Clinics for the Interruption of Pregnancy (ACAI), the gynecologist Josep Lluís Carbonell, an owner of one such clinic himself, who has defended abortion up to the 24th week, which is the limit of foetal viability according to the World Health Organisation. According to Carbonell, many abortions in Spain are performed under a supposed grieve risk for the physical or psychical health of the mother. With respect to the proposal of the Valencian Social Well-Being Regional Ministry to create a network of families to shelter pregnant women, a measure that would decrease the numbers of abortions, Encina García, of Feminist Platform, has called it "perverse" to relate adoption with abortion because "the woman who aborts is because she doesn't want to have that child for her personal reasons or circumstances." "The Valencian regional government cannot dictate laws over the right to adoption," said E. García, who added that "I would like them to tell me if they are promoting the wombs for hire, which is prohibited in Spain." http://www.womenonwaves.org/

Answer: I think that people should be more careful. From both religious and scientific backgrounds - people say that the 'child' is alive - if not yet able to live on its own - so while the "pro-choice" sounds positive... i`m of two minds here. Of course, if it`s a rape or abuse victim - there are grounds to terminate pregnancy. But some people do it because the timing is not convenient for them - or because they became careless and didn`t use protection. So, it`s not a clear "pro" or "con"....

Question: Abortion should be legal? Abortion should be legal, but discouraged as a form of birth control. It should be like cigarettes. They're legal, but there's a warning on the label that explains the health risks. Abortion should be legal and accessible. That way both the pro lifers and the pro choicers could work together and promote other options such as adoption.

Answer: you're absolutely right - everyone must have a freedom of choice

Question: what is the procedure of obtaining legal guardianship in the UK for one's brother residing abroad? Part of Annex 'A' of Tier 4 policy guidance requires that adult student can now show evidence of funds in their parents or legal guardian names. However, in addition to showing evidence of the funds, the applicant must provide the specified original legal documentation (or a notarised copy) establishing the relationship, which must include one of (a) The applicant's birth certificate, showing name of the parent(s) showing the funds; ( Certificate of adoption showing the name of the student and the parent(s) showing the funds; © Court document stating the name of the legal guardian(s) of the named student showing the funds. I am sponsoring my brother who is 25 years old and I am 32 years old. I am not his parent or his legal guardian, what should I do? I believe my options are (1) Open a UK account in his name and transfer the funds (Will be difficult as he does not reside in the UK) (2) Become his legal guardian (Is this possible? IF YES, HOW?) (3) Transfer the funds to his account at my home country (Will be cumbersome and will cost me a lot both in fees and exchange rate risk) Any advice will be highly appreciated.

Answer: You can only be his legal guardian if he is under the age of 18 or he's so incapcitated mentally or physically he requires a guardian, in which case it's unlikely you'll be allowed to bring him to the UK unless you prove you can fund his care

Question: Why is abortion legal? i'm totally against it in every way, but i understand why some people would think it's okay in some ways. like with rape & stuff .. but if there's no risk to the mother, why can't she just have the baby & put it up for adoption ? it just doesn't make sense .. why would you wanna kill a baby ?

Answer: Planned Parenthood was started by a women named Margaret Sanger. Her main point was to kill all darker skinned children, fetuses. Anyway, it's no longer a place just to kill darker skinned, it kills all. It was illegal for a period of time, which drove many people haywire, and thats when street abortions happened. Killing many women. One day, a group of people and young girl went to a judge, saying the girl was raped, is pregnant, and doesn't want the child, legalize abortion. Then, it was legal. Years later, that girl comes out, saying it was all a lie. The rape, the pregnancy, everything. Only did it because she thought it was the right thing to do at the time. Planned Parenthood is good in many ways, such as, providing sex education, condoms, birth control but, the abortion issue, I can't handle. It's not planning parenthood, it's destroying it. Just like you, I am against it. I'm not a Christian, either. I just have a different point a view than others.

Question: Can i legally just go pick up my baby from an adoptive couple? Hello. I made the biggest mistake ever by giving my baby up to an adoptive couple. Well this is how it went..my mom(whom i still live with)found a really nice couple to adopt my baby,which i was considering at the time,because i did feel pressured into it. They are real nice people,and we have become friends. When i had my baby a few weeks ago,i stayed in the hospital for 2 days with him which i loved. After i got home and they took my baby,i was so upset. I really miss him,and i really want him back. I'm in a terrible situation,but i know i can change my mind and i have..i just need to know if i can legally just go pick him up from them? I have not finalized or signed anything. I live in Michigan and I'm not sure how long i have to change my mind,but i heard it was 6 months but i am not sure. I'm also considering bringing my grandma with me so I'm not alone. The adoptive couple hired a lawyer and it's private adoption..and i believe right now it's called Legal Risk Placement,because i haven't signed anything and can change my mind. Well i look forward to reading everyone's answers..Thank You! The couple has already had 3 children whom are all grown up now. So they have had children For people who want to know,i just turned 23 a few days ago...

Answer: sorry but this is really very rude. if you have such thought then why did you give your baby? you have no right to do so. sorry but it is true.

Question: Why does Senator John McCain discriminate against gay people? Employment Non-Discrimination: John McCain does not support a federal non-discrimination law which would outlaw job discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Hate Crimes: John McCain did not support the Local Law Enforcement Act 2005. Same-Sex Marriage: John McCain does not support same-sex marriage. From his website, “The family represents the foundation of Western Civilization and civil society and John McCain believes that the institution of marriage is a union between one man and one woman. It is only this definition that sufficiently recognizes the vital and unique role played by mothers and fathers in the raising of children, and the role of the family in shaping, stabilizing, and strengthening communities and our nation.” Gay and Lesbian Adoption: John McCain opposes gay and lesbian adoption. Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: John McCain does not support gays and lesbians serving in the US armed forces. According to Earth Times in an April 16th letter to Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), McCain states that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell unambiguously maintains that open homosexuality within the military represents an intolerable risk to morale, cohesion and discipline. He has also stated on Meet the Press in November 2007, “I do believe that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell has been very effective.” Additionally: John McCain stated that he supported an Amendment to Arizona’s Constitution that would ban gay marriage and deny government benefits to unmarried couples. Sources: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Earth Times, On the issues, JohnMcCain.com, Arizona Republic.

Answer: I ain't sayin I'm for f*gg*ts or against q***rs, but I will say this: If I had a chance to shove a knife into each of Hitler's eyes and twirl them around until his brains were scrambled and he died a painful, horrible death, I would be gleefully happy. But my happiness at that would not compare to the happiness of having the chance of disemboweling each and every Hitler Jr. on these boards, in the military, and in the government who espouses his philosophies every time they spew their genocidal hatred of anyone they wish to scapegoat. Let me be quite clear. Your right to freedom of speech ends at the point where you threaten the rights of another. To even speak of a scheme to lessen the life experience of another human-being - a fellow citizen no doubt - is deserving of death. Especially when that citizen has done NOTHING to try to take your rights away. You don't like having you or your children or your soldiers exposed to that lifestyle???WTF?So that makes you more human, more righteous, more entitled, more what? More deserving of a life of freedom from someone trying to ACTIVELY and CONSTANTLY take your rights? Well it works like that no longer. As you judge, so have you been judged. 'Cause I ain't waitin for you to finish annihilating THEM so you can then come after ME. And I ain't the only one.

Question: Foster Parent Shortages? Well, two years ago we started down the path to be foster to adopt parents. It took us 6 months to get the homestudy done, the safety check done as well as the mandated training and background checks. Once we were accepted and licensed as a foster home it literally took us hours before we were offered our first placement of a 4 day old and from there 6 more months to get the adoption finalized. We just accepted our second placement today of a 6 day old little boy who was apprehended at birth due to being at risk. He will remain a foster child until the courts decide otherwise but from the little I know about his natural parents history and current situation it looks like this little guy will be staying with us as well. I hear so many people talking about how difficult adoption is, how expensive it is, how much of a nuisance the process is and I don't understand it. Sure, it can be emotionally trying at times but that is all part of the risk. At the same time there have been great joys as we watched our last foster child, now our daughter, go from being a helpless infant to a laughing, healthy and precocious toddler. All indications are that this little guy will follow the same path but all we can do is hope and pray for the best for him. Given the relative success we have had with the program and the ease with which we got cleared and involved with it all, I can't help but wonder what keeps people away. Is it the emotional and legal risk (not knowing if the child will be returned by the Courts)? Is it that it is perceived as too difficult? Is it that the programs are not well advertised and publicized? Is there a stigma attached to it all? What do you think keeps people away? It can't be because they want infants only. We have had two now in two years and our only criteria were that they were to be suitably younger then our youngest which would mean 13 years or less. Sizesmith - in foster care adoptions open adoptions are often not allowed owing to the reasons why the children were removed from their birth parents care in the first place and the requirement to ensure their safety. These children do not enter the system with the willful consent of their parents in most cases so their security is always a concern. Opedial - Of course we wouldn't have liked it if she went back but, after all, isn't that what the foster care program is supposed to do where possible? Everyone wants the kids with their natural parents but when that can't happen (was was clearly the case with the first one but I won't go into her details publicly) they need to go somewhere. Personally, I'd rather have them with one family, that will maybe be their permanent family if they have to go for adoption, then have them bounce around foster homes till they either go back or go for adoption. Looking at it from the child's perspective, that stability during an already trying time is very important and if we, as adults, can't help out and assume some of the emotional turmoil for the kids then there is something wrong with us "grown ups". Your attitude about it all seems to fly in the face of what everyone else around here is always calling for and it surprises me. As for inter Provincial cooperation and transfers, again that seems to fly in the face of what people preach as well. Kids will be uprooted from foster families, Provincial services they are entitled to (which are different in every Province), potential family connections... All indications are, as I understand it, keep them where they are for stability, comfort and continuity. Isn't the Govt still paying out millions over having moved orphans around, for their own good, in the 40s and 50s? We can't have it both ways so the question then becomes, what can we do to improve their situation where they are?

Answer: Alot of people just aren't educated enough about it. I was lucky enough to grow up around foster care. But you mention it to some and they cringe. They think the kids are demons and have no respect for anything. But its not true. Some kids need more guidance than others but the fact is they all need a home. And a home isn't just a roof over their heads. And a lot of others just don't have the heart to let them go. Its hard to take a child in let them become a part of you and watch them leave.

Question: Adoption through foster care and hostile natural parents? Our son was placed with us for permanent care and adoption at age 2, he is now 3. He currently has ongoing contact with his natural parents (fortnightly/monthly) supervised by child protection. During his time with us we have made numerous attempts at communication with his natural parents, through communication books, letter, photos etc. However they remain consistantly hostile towards us and have a long history of making false allegations and unfounded complaints. Our son is now strongly resisting contact with his natural parents and we feel that he is becoming unsettled by the pressures they are placing on him. Specifically they attempt to say some innappropriate things to him during contact, including some untrue and hurtful comments about our relationship and feelings for him. I'm growing increasingly concerned as our relationship with the department will soon be severed due to legal proceedings (it's quite a complicated and unique case) and it will fall to us to either supervise contact ourselves or make our own arrangements as his former case worker will no longer be able to provide us with that support. Contacts will likely be reduced to a few times per year, and we want to make those count to maintain a connection with his natural family for our son. Further to this the natural parents lifestyle and activities at times places them at great risk and I'm concerned for their safety and consequently the impact this will have on our son. It has been extremely difficult to encourage an attachment between our son and his natural parents and I'm trying my hardest to encourage a bond between them. What can I do to form a positive or at least civil relationship between all of us? We have always shown the utmost respect for our son's natural parents and the role and contribution they have in his life. We keep them updated with all his milestones and achievements, and I would like to see a more positive interaction between us. Any suggestions would be very welcome. Just to clarify: It is an adoption from a previous foster care situation, it has just been somewhat complicated until now. Alos, we want contact to be ongoing, even if it's only a few times a year in the future. To put it bluntly, the natural parents lifestyle is dangerous and it's quite possible that they could pass away at any given time in the future, so I am very, very reluctant to stop contact. Basically stopping contact is not an option unless they do something threatening or dangerous to our son. Making nice also doesn't seem to be working. Maybe it's hopeless, I was just hoping someone would have some experience with a similar situation or some creative advice.

Answer: Just keep treating them with the honor that they deserve as the people who brought your son into your lives. And, be realistic but kind & forgiving about who they are, what their reality is, what life experiences brought them to where they are in their lives. You can't change them. You can only behave towards them as you feel is right (no matter how they are behaving towards you) -and- model kind, forgiving, but safe behavior for your son.

Question: Hoping to adopt a baby/toddler/preschooler? Yeah, I know the anti-adoption trolls will be attacking but that's okay. I love you all just the same. :-) Anyway, we are legally approved to adopt from any state and just need help finding someone who needs to place a child. Please don't tell me to go through DSS as we already have done so but do not want a legal risk placement. We also have applied for kids on adoptuskids.org and will continue to do so. So, if anyone out there can help, please feel free to PM me for more info. Thanks!

Answer: I was just wondering if you had looked into fostering and then if a child becomes available for adoption that was in your care you would have first chance----here the goal of children entering care is return home but many go on to be adopted.

Question: Adoption question.? We have been approved through the foster system to fost/adopt an infant/toddler and even agreed to take legal risk placements and emergency placements. We are so thrilled to be doing this. BUT, the phone is not ringing. So this is very depressing. I'd really appreciate any advise or if someone could share their experiences. How long did it take you to be phoned? We have a HUGE home/yard, are very involved in the community, and we are financially secure. I just don't understand why we haven't had a placement...even if it is just to foster. In addition, we put up the baby bed (after getting a false alarm call) and bought a high chair. What other things would you recommend we go ahead and purchase? I look forward to your answers and advice.

Answer: Congratulations on being approved through the foster system! As one poster noted, sometimes you have to make yourselves a bit of a pest - e-mail, write letters, call, etc. to the appropriate people. Remember, though, the social workers have a lot of cases to work on and they can't always get back to you, or sometimes there may not be a need for placement. Is there a "list" of other foster parents you can talk to about what is needed? Just try to hold on to your sanity and take it day by day. It will happen. Good luck!

Question: My daughter who is in rehab is at risk of losing her 1year old baby to the foster parents. Help.? When my daughter finally went into rehab, her baby was one month short of a year old. Now that she is in rehab there is talk of the courts in Nevada trying to terminate her parental rights. I had originally had arranged for my granddaughters transfer to my home state but the state of Nevada kept her with extended family of the father. Now they want to adopt her and my daughter has finally gotten help and wants her baby. I was also approved originally to get my granddaughter but the family seemed intent and the caseworker as well, on keeping the baby there. The caseworker also has a very close relationship with the foster parents and it is obvious that she favors their going for the adoption of my granddaughter. Aren't caseworkers supposed to be objective and isn't their job to try and unite parents with their children? My ex and I are hoping this is not going to turn into a legal battle. I don't want my granddaughter adopted so soon. Help with advice. Thank you.

Answer: get legal advice

Question: Why should inter-family marriage be illegal if same sex marriage is legal? Constructive argument.? According to most people, inter-family marriage should NOT be allowed because if they procreate, the children will be at high risk of disorders. **THIS IS CORRECT** However, based on this, the MARRIAGE is not allowed because the CHILDREN, not the TWO PEOPLE BEING MARRIED, are at risk. The MARRIAGE is defined by the CHILDREN in this case.However, take into consideration same sex marriage. THEY CANNOT HAVE CHILDREN. If you take the same definition of marriage as the first example, 2 people who are in love who can have SAFE CHILDREN, doesn't that mean that gays, who are INCAPABLE of having children without adoption or surrogate, should not be allowed to marry either? Or does the definition of marriage change based on who is being married, which is absurd. Family members can love each other just as much as gays can. Both cannot have children in the practical way. People support one while turning away the other.

Answer: yeh, you are a real dick richard. appart from the serius problems of having inbred children its just immoral. so is same sex marriage so who knows maybe 1 day theyl allow it?

Question: Anyone have input on the ethical and legal implications of...? ...extending an invite to our son's first mother to live in our city, probably in a house we rent out? Background: Recently, we have heard from her about her failing health. It isn't good and neither is her state of mind. We have had some very disconcerting messages from her recently and know she feels lost. Today we received an email suggesting TO US some sort of joint custody arrangement because she doesn't feel she can do it alone once back in the country with her daughter, our son's full sister. This would be an opportunity for both kids to know each other, especially given that we were asked to parent her if anything happened to her or bio dad. We would not pay anything for her. She would pay rent and receive whatever assistance she would get anywhere else. Complications: Child was born overseas and may not be considered a dual citizen. Bio dad (who may not be able to come back...he was deported) may not consent to an adoption IF that ever came up so the kids would be close only to have it all ripped apart. He would never get custody HERE due to the nature of his past crimes and incarceration. First mom may be at risk of losing this girl to children's services and although we would likely be the receiving home...we don't want to interfere with ANY of that. Those chips have to fall as they will although avoiding it by supporting her would be ideal. (if bio dad makes it back to live with them...totally different opinion on that) First mom definitely needs support of an emotional kind and this could become very complicated in a negative way. We have no problems with our son knowing her, talking with her etc...but if we intertwine too much..it may interfere with parenting from both sides...at least that's a concern I currently have. So...we know that in the end, we would have to consult a lawyer before any of this is SUGGESTED to her but wondered if anyone had insight from personal experience. Doing the right thing sure is complicated...our son is the first priority (ie. safety and well-being) but it can get blurry too. It's easy to want to just solve it all for everyone but a lot of that is reflex reaction and not necessarily best for the long run. Opinions from all of you would be welcome and thanks! @Rosie: Ever the voice of reason! To clarify. We would pay NOTHING. She would draw support from whatever means would apply elsewhere from social services. So...no transaction. Her ailment isn't terminal but is debilitating if she doesn't follow a very strict diet. She always tired right now and in pain. She has moments of strengths and power but yes...recently she shared some homicidal thoughts towards an abusive person from her past with whom she has other children (very long term, but abusive common-law relationship). NEVER even crossed my mind that could spill into our life safety wise. Thank you. Bio dad will never get custody here but certainly possible he could initiate procedures to have the daughter returned overseas. Very unlikely though as he is in his late 50's and seems sort of...uninvolved and so does his family. First mom has ruled the roost re: the little girl and will come whether he does or not. I do doubt her ability to parent. Only in thinking about her daughter's welfare but we will not interfere with this bond. I can't imagine losing our son now so the pain she and the daughter would feel after being separated is too much for me to bear. The only exception is if bio dad can get back to live with her. We will risk our relationship with her to save the girl. And you are right about hands off support. That is a little harder though. She is our son's first mom. If we want her to succeed as a good parent NOW...having someone to count on would be the right thing. But not at the risk of hurting our son. She already asks for advice and guidance on things so the line is already blurred to a point. Being so close physically would definitely be a further tie. AARRGGHHH Don't care if it isn't "pretty". I need to hear it.

Answer: Hey Ferbs! I think you already know your answer with this one. Deep down. I know you do. I think that renting out to her would be an engagement that wouldn't be wise. Reasons being, no matter what you think of her now, if hardships fell upon her, that would influence you, like not paying rent or such, this is too close to home. It's kinda like mixing family with business, not usually a good thing. Just my opinion. Although I do think it is wonderful how you keep in touch, I know that must be very confusing for you and if it is already confusing for you, how is it for your family and your son? I can already read that you know the right answer to this, but I think you think you will be insensitive by laying down your boundaries or robbing someone of what they are entitled to. Well, at the same time, I think entitlement comes with responsibility and trust. You have a job to do as a mother. This job contains certain points. If your job is interfered with in any way, you know what to do and reserve a later time to review the situation again. If you feel it's not being interfered with and have a gut instinct good feeling about it, then by all means support it. Your priorities are in order. My Angel bomb is on her way to you! Sleep well and trust yourself! :-) You already know what to do. J

Question: A political question: what political label would you give me? This is just an experiment on my part to see what sort of answers I get. The more reasoning behind the answer, the better. Now, here are some of my views. I think: - the rich should pay more taxes than the poor. - it's none of my business who sleeps with or marries whom, as long as they're all consenting adults. - the government should provide basic health care to those who need it, and insurance should not cover frivolous plastic surgery. - religion should not be part of politics. - politicians should not use dishonest campaigning tactics. - abortion should be a legal option, but only in the first trimester or in case of severe risk to the mother. - adoption/foster care should be available to anyone who can prove they can care for a child, and hold no criminal record beyond traffic violations. - war should only be a last resort. - strong foreign policy is a good thing. - Legal immigrants & refugees = ok, illegals = seek legal visa or deport. - citizens don't need machine guns.

Answer: Sounds to me like you're a flaming Democrat.

Question: What do you think of Democrats sneaking illegal alien amnesy into a bill to help haiti orphans? Republicans, though, are expected to raise a huge ruckus over the Help Haiti Act, a measure to ease adoptions from the devastated nation. Democrats yanked the bill from the calendar and Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE) has sent a letter expressing concern about rumors that the popular measure will be used to aid the passage of the DREAM Act. One could be amended to the other or both could be added to another bill for a sweet and sour effect. From Fortenberry’s letter to the Democratic leadership: “My office has heard reports that this critical legislative fix, which would clear legal obstacles to U.S. citizenship for as many as 1200 Haitian orphans who were in the process of being adopted before the January 12 earthquake, may be used as a vehicle for a controversial immigration measure." "Please know that while these vulnerable orphans’ status remains in limbo, they have fewer legal protections, may not be eligible for critical resources, and risk being forced to return to Haiti.” http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-218403-0-day… They will use the HELP HAITI bill to pass illegal alien amnesty, which is more controversial, by amending the DREAM act to the HELP HAITI bill

Answer: I think it is dishonest people acting dishonestly. Democrats know they can't do their deeds in the light of day because the people will reject them as they did on Nov 2.

Question: please take it-its for my AP gov class? Abortion Survey for AP Gov/Econ --------------------------------------… What political party do you belong to? What is your age? What is your gender? --------------------------------------… 1. Have you, or anyone you know had an abortion? 2. Do you believe that a teen age girl 18 or under, should require a parent/guardians legal consent to get an abortion ? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 3. Should abortion be legal within 30 days of the pregnancy? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 4. Which do you think would be more difficult for you emotionally, giving a newborn child of yours up for adoption, or having an abortion? 5. Do you agree or disagree with the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that established a woman's right to an abortion? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 6. Do you feel a woman should have the right to choose to terminate an unwanted pregnancy if under 30 days? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 7. Do you feel a woman and her partner both should have the right to choose to terminate an unwanted pregnancy? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 8. Do you think the fetus is a person under 30 days? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 9. Do you think the abortion effect the men? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 10. Is an abortion okay if the women is at risk? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 11. Is an abortion okay if the woman was raped ? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree Thank You

Answer: Abortion Survey for AP Gov/Econ ------------------------------... What political party do you belong to? none What is your age? 21 What is your gender? female ------------------------------... 1. Have you, or anyone you know had an abortion? no 2. Do you believe that a teen age girl 18 or under, should require a parent/guardians legal consent to get an abortion ? yes 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 3. Should abortion be legal within 30 days of the pregnancy? 1 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 4. Which do you think would be more difficult for you emotionally, giving a newborn child of yours up for adoption, or having an abortion? abortion 5. Do you agree or disagree with the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that established a woman's right to an abortion? 3 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 6. Do you feel a woman should have the right to choose to terminate an unwanted pregnancy if under 30 days? 3 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 7. Do you feel a woman and her partner both should have the right to choose to terminate an unwanted pregnancy? 1 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 8. Do you think the fetus is a person under 30 days? 3 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 9. Do you think the abortion effect the men? 1 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 10. Is an abortion okay if the women is at risk? 1 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree 11. Is an abortion okay if the woman was raped ? 1 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree

Question: Why would anybody get a third- trimester abortion? I'm pro-choice personally, but I don't see how third-trimester abortions can be legal. I also don't understand why anybody would do it. I understand it in the first few weeks because the fetus can't feel pain and would not be viable outside the womb. But why get an abortion at 7 months? You've already gone through 7 months of a pregnancy, so why not take an extra 2 and then give the baby up for adoption? (Unless the mother's health is at risk i don't understand the point of this). Can anyone explain people's reasons (logically) for doing this? If you've personally had one I'd like to hear the reasons. This isn't an attack, but a seriously curious question. also I should point out I would never get an abortion personally, I am pro-choice because if it was made illegal, back-alley abortions would still happen and be less safe. So don't yell at me. I know these are reeeally rare, I was just wondering why anyone would even think of doing it, it just seems like a real waste. interesting responses! I've just become fascinated with this lately and I want as much info as possible.

Answer: Considering all that you've just said you should be pro-life. A bunch of people being pro-life doesn't mean they'll make abortions illegal, but they should anyway. The fact that people will still do it shouldn't make you pro-choice, murder is illegal but people are still doing in in alleys I'm sure so are you for that. Also a fetus or BABY may or may not feel pain at a few weeks, no one can really say because obviously they've never been in that situation, & it may not be viable outside the womb but it's still a BABY, a HUMAN, a PERSON. And for people say well a person has the right to choose, then what about that person in the bellies choice, I'm sure it'd choose to live. I personally think anyone who wants to have an abortion should have to go through the pregnancy & give it up for adoption. Even if it's special needs there are adoption agencies for that & most fetus that have a really severe problem miscarry. And if it's the result of rape or something then that really really sucks but the little person shouldn't be punished. Also for the stupid youngsters who get prego then want an abortion, they had the choice to wear a condom or at least pull out & the girl had the choice to be on birth control, there are places where a minor can get birth control no questions ask. Going through the pregnancy & birth sure would teach them a lesson fast. So that's what I think, not trying to yell at you so sorry if it sounded like I was. I just feel very strongly about this subject & I don't see how anyone could ever get an abortion at anytime.

Question: Do I need a permit or anything to pass out flyers for my political party outside a polling place? I will be passing out flyers that say something like the following: Libertarian The OTHER Conservative Choice Candidates running on the Libertarian Ticket are running on the following platform: 1 Personal Liberty Individuals should be free to make choices for themselves and to accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. No individual, group, or government may initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. Our support of an individual's right to make choices in life does not mean that we necessarily approve or disapprove of those choices. 1.1 Expression and Communication We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion. 2 Personal Privacy Libertarians support the rights recognized by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure should include records held by third parties, such as email, medical, and library records. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes. 3 Personal Relationships Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships. 4 Crime and Justice Government exists to protect the rights of every individual including life, liberty and property. Criminal laws should be limited to violation of the rights of others through force or fraud, or deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Individuals retain the right to voluntarily assume risk of harm to themselves. We support restitution of the victim to the fullest degree possible at the expense of the criminal or the negligent wrongdoer. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must not be denied. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law. 6 Economic Liberty Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society. 10 Government Finance and Spending All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes. 15 Health Care We favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want, the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health insurance across state lines. The libertarian, or "classical liberal," perspective is that individual well-being, prosperity, and social harmony are fostered by "as much liberty as possible" and "as little government as necessary."

Answer: It depends on your state. I live in Ohio and here the law is you cannot pass out flyers or hold up signs within I believe 200 yards of voting polls.