Object Objection

Question: In our society we have to have permission to object: What if our objection is against the establishment? Are the establishment likely to give us permission to object about what they do? Should we even go down the permission route ?

Answer: I t depends on how strong the need to object is if it is only you object away nobody will bother but if there are hundreds or thousands then you get demonstrations. This happened with the Poll Tax under that Thatcher woman and it got changed

Question: Can you object to an objection? In court, can you object to an objection? For example: Prosecutor gives character evidence Defense objects on terms of irrelevance Prosecutor objects to the objection by defending that they are giving character evidence. I mean this is for BEFORE the judge decides whether to sustain or overrule it.

Answer: Actually, no. When one lawyer objects to some question or remark, the other lawyer gets to defend his question or remark and then the judge rules. Defending the question is not an objection.

Question: what is the difference between indirect object and direct objection?

Answer: Easiest way for me to explain: direct object receives the action of the verb [I sold the cake]; indirect object receives the direct object [I sold my mother the cake]... Get's a little tricky with "commnication verbs": "She told us a story". The story is the direct object; we 'sorta' received the story, so 'us' is the indirect object. A better explanation might be The direct object is the thing going from the subject to the indirect object. The indirect object is the person who receives the direct object from the subject. The idea of going from one person to another is based on the verb give, where the movement from one person to another is more obvious. With other verbs the movement from one person to another is not necessarily literal motion. Fred gave Mary a diamond ring. The diamond ring went from Fred to Mary. Fred is the subject. Mary is the indirect object. a diamond ring is the direct object. Henry told Susan a lie. The lie 'went' from Henry to Susan. Henry is the subject. Susan is the indirect object. a lie is the direct object. The teacher showed the diagrams to the students. The diagrams 'went' from the teacher to the students. the teacher is the subject. the students is the indirect object. the diagrams is the direct object. The boss brought us doughnuts and coffee. The doughnuts and coffee went from the boss to us. the boss is the subject. us is the indirect object. the doughnuts and coffee is the direct object. Once in a great while the indirect object is not a person. The boy gave his shoes a good polishing. The polishing 'went' from the boy to the shoes. the boy is the subject. his shoes is the indirect object. a good polishing is the direct object.

Question: mark the stress in the words"photography,object,express,obje…

Answer: Note: the stressed syllable is written in upper case (capital letters) Stress is on TO in the phoTOgraphy, Object (stress on O refers to a thing (noun) obJect (refers to denying something (verb), EXpress

Question: This is for (level 1) avatars; if you object note down your objection!? All right i have observed that all the answers that i have answered to level 1 avatars are chosen as the best by the voters and not by the askers. I wondered why it is so!? So i would like to till you (level 1 avatars ) that when you ask a question you should check it after one day or two, to choose the best answer according to you. That is how yours is chosen as the best as well (^_^) hope that was useful and if you object or oppose please note it down! My greetings........ That was an advice!

Answer: I am not a level 1 user but i believe there are several reasons why many level 1 users fail to choose a best answer for their question. ►They have yet to find out how the site works ►They only created the account to ask the one question, and once they received an answer they leave the site for good. ►They may not know they are 'expected' to choose a best answer ►They couldn't come to a conclusion on which answer to choose, so wanted the Yahoo! Answers community to do so. ►They may not be very frequent users of the site, meaning by the time they log in again the 'question period would have expired' meaning it is automatically put into voting.

Question: List of possible reasons to object in a courtroom? Can people just fire out valid reasons to object in a courtroom like so... Objection - hearsay Best answer = the most options. Thanks!

Answer: Proper reasons for objecting to a question asked of a witness include: Ambiguous, confusing, misleading, vague, unintelligible: the question is not clear and precise enough for the witness to properly answer Arguing the law: counsel is instructing the jury on the law. Argumentative: the question makes an argument rather than asking a question Asked and answered: the question has been asked and answered before Asks the jury to prejudge the evidence: the jury cannot promise to vote a certain way, even if certain facts are proved. Asking a question which is not related to an intelligent exercise of a peremptory challenge or challenge for cause: if opposing counsel asks such a question during voir dire. Assumes facts not in evidence: the question assumes something as true for which no evidence has been shown Badgering: counsel is antagonizing the witness in order to provoke a response, either by asking questions without giving the witness an opportunity to answer or by openly mocking the witness. Best evidence rule: requires that the original source of evidence is required if available; for example, rather than asking a witness about the contents of a document, the actual document should be entered into evidence Beyond the scope: A question asked during cross-examination has to be within the scope of direct, and so on. Calls for a conclusion: the question asks for an opinion rather than facts Calls for speculation: the question asks the witness to guess the answer rather than to rely on known facts Compound question: multiple questions asked together Hearsay: the witness does not know the answer personally but heard it from another Incompetent: the witness is not qualified to answer the question Inflammatory: the question is intended to cause prejudice Leading question (Direct examination only): the question suggests the answer to the witness. Leading questions are permitted if the attorney conducting the examination has received permission to treat the witness as a hostile witness. Leading questions are also permitted on cross-examination, as witnesses called by the opposing party are presumed hostile. Narrative: the question asks the witness to relate a story rather than state specific facts Privilege: the witness may be protected by law from answering the question Irrelevant or immaterial: the question is not about the issues in the trial Proper reasons for objecting to material evidence include: Lack of foundation: the evidence lacks testimony as to its authenticity or source Proper reasons for objecting to a witness's answer include: Narrative: the witness is relating a story in response to a question that didn't ask for a story Non-responsive: the witness did not answer the question; the answer would be stricken from the record Nothing pending: the witness continues to speak on matters irrelevant to the question.

Question: Would you agree that womens objection to porn is fueled by their own insecurities(those that object obviously)? Jenn, I'm beginng to draw the conclusion that you are quite insane,I bet I'll be sure of it soon.

Answer: I loved your answer on that question. Yes, one thousand times, yes.

Question: when i do anything i want it and may be object with other,may be the others conviced with my objection? then i feel sinful how can i ge rid of sin knot

Answer: the first half of your tail we call "incoherency" as to the sin knot you define what is or is not sin & act accordingly!

Question: What is the objection/fear of having a group home located on your street? I have heard people object to the idea of a "group home" going in on their street which would be a home for disabled and retarded adults. What is their real objection or fear about this? Some claim it will have a negative impact on property values. Please explain. In this case, no zoning laws have changed for the Group Home. It's simply a regular residential area. Anyone have a real study to cite that shows property values are impacted by a Group Home?

Answer: I have not heard the term "retarded" in many years. The change in zoning does in fact decrease property values. Simple plain fact. The other issues are increased traffic, foot, public and automotive and increased social issues (noise, trash, etc). Once the zoning has changed the neighborhood is also subject to group homes for drug addicts, released criminals and the like. I would pitch a fit if my city even dreamed of doing this to me.

Question: What would be an objection to the following claim? Please answer using the following format: Objection! (to the one above me): ... I can't object to God. Claim: Dragon Ball Z characters are essentially light bulbs. Reasoning: The greater the character's power level, the more energy (s)he outputs. The higher the watt rating for a light bulb, the brighter it glows.

Answer: Objection! He did not follow the format. Claim: He breaks rules. Reasoning: It's undeniable.

Question: Did anyone have objections agianst or object the Theory of relativity? Im doing a science project and i have to list a couple major objectors and i literally looked for two days but i couldn't find one. So if anyone knows of any objectors than please tell me and the source you got it from. Thanks

Answer: many of the older physicists, that were already established at the time (early 1900's) did not except Relativity Michelson and Morely were still doing their experiment 30 years after SR (SR said their would be a null result) Plank and Lorentz, even Schrodinger had, you could say, reservations...but almost all of them came to except it - specially as the results of the Eclipse experiment gave good evidence for GR. So, a few objectors include: Lorentz, Poincaré, Abraham, Langevin - these are the main ones, but i think even these eventually changed their mind. This question is also clouded by the fact that at that time in Germany, it was considered a 'Jewish' science, and was often said to be untrue, even by people that probably believed it, just because it was such bad kudos to accept a jewish theory at that time.

Question: Will my objection to Custody & Visits be taken into consideration if it went past the 15 days I had to object? custody & visitation order

Answer: You can try but not very likely unless you have NEW developments or PROOF that there is a safety or health risk to the child for some reason. If you had an objection then you should have filed BEFORE the window closed. Ugh, my ex complained about the child support order so I told him to file an objection... Instead of filing he decided it made him feel better to keep blaming me for the court's decision, let the window pass, and still blames me now for what the COURT decided, NOT ME.

Question: how do I file an arbitration notice of objection? I have a civil aw suit with citibank, where the case management judge ordered it to arbitration, which form do I need to use to object arbitration and what are the best reasons to object? shoued I mention the reasons to object in the notice or wait till objection hearing?

Answer: I'd check your contract first. Most bank agreements have legally enforceable arbitration provisions. Even if you want a court case you've probably given up that right and agreed to arbitration if either party (you or they) asked for it. Obviously 99% of the time they will ask for it.

Question: If someone raises an objection during a wedding, what happens then? "Does anyone object to this couple being wedded? Speak now or forever hold your peace.........." In the rare event that someone DOES object: Do they stop the proceedings and debate the objection? Carry on as if nothing happened? Start an argument/quarrel?

Answer: Most wedding ceremonies don't ask that question, but some states still require it. The vast majority of the time when an objection is raised, it is because one of the couple is not free to marry (e.g. the bride was previously married and the divorce isn't final). It's very, very rare when someone stands up and says something like "I don't like him." What happens when an objection is raised? The officiant usually stops the wedding, takes the bride, groom, objector, and sometimes the parents off to a side room, discusses the issue, then everyone returns and the the wedding continues or just the officiant comes back and tells everyone the wedding is cancelled. Sometimes the person will blurt out the reason in front of everyone "She can't cook". In that case, the person is escorted out by an usher and the wedding continues.

Question: What is a faulty objection called? I read something awhile ago about what a bad objection is called like in Liar, Lair (Fletcher: Your honor, I object! Judge: Why? Fletcher: Because it's devastating to my case! Judge: Overruled. Fletcher: Good call!) It is called, all you smart legal folk?

Answer: An objection, whether it is allowed or disallowed, approved or denied, or any other verbiage by the judge, is still called an objection. whale

Question: What happens if someone says "I object" in the middle of a wedding? Whenever the phrase "If there is reason these two should not be wed, speak now or forever hold your piece(peace?)" is said near the end of a wedding, the congregation usually stays silent, allowing the wedding to continue. But what happens if at that point someone objects to it? Is the person escorted off the premises to avoid causing a ruckus? Does the wedding instantly get called off as a result of that objection? Do they weigh the pros and cons of the situation, now that said cons are brought to everyone's collective attention?

Answer: I talked to a priest about this, and here's what he said: First off, it rarely happens. When it does the person is brought aside with the couple (Not in front of EVERYBODY) and asked why he/she is objecting. If there is a legal reason (she's under 18, he's still married, that's a fake identity...) then the wedding is called off, and the couple is not allowed to wed, otherwise show goes on. If it's like "I don't like him!" then the non supporter is asked to leave or talk about their feelings afterward, but with something like that, usually the couple knows about the objection before hand.

Question: Why did Quakers object to world war I? Well I am supposed to do some History coursewwork on Conscientious objection but I am stuck. Does anyobdy know who the quakers are and why they objected to the war.

Answer: I believe they are pacifists and they object to all wars. This link might lead you to more information: http://westernquaker.net/study_guide_for…

Question: What is the 'Objection' where you are asking multiple questions in one question? What is that 'Objection' called? When you ask like "Where you carrying a gun at the time, were you holding it and was it loaded?" That's multiple questions in one question, what do you object to? e.g hearsay, relevance?

Answer: It is called a compound question.

Question: Why, on what grounds do some people object to atheists speaking out regarding their opinion and objection to? the intrusion of religion in our schools and politics? I am not as curious (in this question) about your thoughts on the intrusion of religion in our schools and politics, as I am about why some people have a problem with us voicing our thoughts? On what grounds do some people object to hearing that our thoughts are different to theirs? Angel of death there are plenty of activists addressing the problems you speak of. In my opinion, every time a rational atheist speaks out they help ' to remove the stigma of atheism in politics' as well as all other areas. grayure: I liked your answer, but it has been possible/achieved in many secular countries.

Answer: Because when things are different, it is scary, and sometimes they just want a great big god hug to make them feel safe again and those meanie head atheists wont let them have it...

Question: Why do the religious only ever object to theories which contradict their religion? First there was the advent of cell theory, which was highly debated (scientists were often called 'witches' and burned at the stake), plate tectonics, the old age of the earth is STILL debated, as is, sadly, evolution, the big bang, etc... But why no objections to, say, quantum mechanics? Newtonian physics? The atomic 'theory'? Can't seem to find any flaws in those, yet you manage to object to the rock-solid evidence of radiometric dating?

Answer: Ok, first off, as a quantum physicist, let me tell you that religious people do object to quantum mechanics, I guess you just aren't sensitive enough on that issue to hear them, since they yell less loudly on that topic than they do on others. However, I have to take issue with your question. You ask why religious people only object to things that contradict their religion. But that is not a characteristic of religious people. No, in fact that is a characteristic of all people! And rightfully so. Why would you possibly object to a theory that did not contradict with what you believed? The whole point of objecting is that whatever you are objecting to is counter to your beliefs or opinions or morals or whatnot. You can not possibly fault religious people for objecting to theories that contradict what they believe. And you can not possibly fault religious people for not objecting to theories that do not contradict their beliefs. You do exactly the same thing. You object to ideas that contradict your beliefs and you do not object to ideas that do not contradict your beliefs. That is simple human nature. In fact, I would go further than that and say that is only logical to object to things that contradict your beliefs or tastes or etc. This is not the problem. The problem is holding a belief that is contrary to evidence. But objecting to things that contradict with your beliefs is simply: that way things should be.