National Medical Support Notice

Question: How would I be categorized politically? I support unborn rights and would support a pro-life amendment to the constitution, with the only acceptation for the mother's life. I would abolish the department of education because it's a local and state level responsibility. I support the right to bear arms, concealed weapons licenses, hunting, stand your ground laws, etc. I support a 2 strikes and your out drunk driving law. I support a his body his choice law banning infant circumcision unless it is to treat a legitimate medical condition. I support the decriminalizing of marijuana because it is less harmful than alcohol. I think the drinking age should be 18 to match the age of adulthood. I think it is of the highest urgency to become and stay energy independent. I support nuclear power and increasing the number of nuclear power plants across America. I would push the auto makers to make electric cars available for drivers who want them. I would set and push for goals of energy independence, curing cancer, and paying down the nation debt. I oppose the endangered species act because it has failed to protect one species and has only given government control of people's land. I would raise the levels of fines on employers hiring illegal aliens. Homeland security should only be used as an anti-terror agency and criminal law enforcement should be handled by other agencies. I don't believe there is such thing as a gay marriage and think we should give them the same privileges that comes with marriage but call it something else. I think capitalism is the greatest antipoverty tool the world has ever seen and encourage the economy, not put outrageous taxes on it. I don't believe humans are warming up the Earth but I think we need to clean up some of the messes we are making such as air quality. I believe in a small federal government. I don't think the general public should even notice the federal government unless they visit their local military recruiter or post office. No more ethanol, it causes higher grocery bills and less MPG. I support Boone's plan. I support the rights of nudists to live their lifestyle on their privately owned property without the government telling them they must put clothes on. I am a Christian but don't think it's the government's job to push morality, I think morality must come from the people up. Not the government down. I support net neutrality, and oppose bandwidth caps. I would revert our copyright laws back to that of the Webster and Benjamin Franklin years: An item can be copyrighted for 14 years, renewable once, then falls into public domain. We allow men to go out in public shirtless. I support amending the law allowing both genders to do the same. One gender shirtless is discrimination. I support women's rights to breast feed in public. That is the function of the breast. I don't think anyone has ever been harmed for seeing a breast. I think smokers should be required to pay their own way when they get cancer and heart disease. Not get public money to fight a self imposed condition. I would allow people to own their social security accounts and allow them to invest in a Roth IRA within their social security account so the people may build a nest egg to retire on. Each person will own their account and congress may never dip into it. I would make it illegal for credit card companies to raise interest rates, at will, with no delinquent activity: banning universal default. Absolutely, no more national debt. No more borrowing. I believe terminally ill patients should be allowed to take experimental drugs that have yet to receive FDA approval. Lets get rid of the IRS, replace tax system with flat tax or national sales tax. The IRS and current tax code only exists to control people. I oppose taxes on broadband internet access, sales tax on in items bought online, and regulation of online content. I don't believe our government is up to the task of providing national heath care and it's much better off left in the hands of the private sector. I think adults should legally be able to take steroids for body building if he is not competing in competitive sports. I think daylight savings time should be expanded to a year round project. I oppose the government regulating the content of literature, films, video games, etc.

Answer: well im not sure what to call it, but I agree with 80% of that.

Question: Where is a good place to advertise for parents who want to work from home for a company in the medical field? I noticed that many of the places are filled with these get rich quick,scam sort of companies and I prefer not to be associated with them. We have been around since 1992 and are members of the US Chamber of Commerce, National Health Alliance, National Dental Association just to name a few. We have full training and support so we do not need people with prior experience. It is mostly computer work. I already have ads on Monster.com and craigslist and I have good results. I am looking for FRESH ideas.

Answer: Advertise in: Craigslist.com Backpage.com and use.. Google Adwords Overture.com

Question: Health insurance in USA is a complete rip off, scrap it and lets get competitive pricing for national service? I noticed my old friends in the USA are having a big debate about healthcare, getting a better service for all and at a better price. From some press reports I have read Some of you do not like to look a gift horse in the mouth? maybe you work for insurance companies I suspect! This is why I KNOW that Americans are being scammed and ripped off by the Government, Health insurance and the hospitals. I am from Uk but spent 7 years there in San Diego, Houston and Phoenix and I needed treatment 3 times for various things. On all 3 occasions I was charged a small fortune ($2000) for menial medical work, (a stitch in my lip and check pulse, most of the time I spent waiting to be seen, (hours). When I told them I had no medical insurance they reduced it to $300. Case 2 Blood tests ($940) but if I paid cash $130, Sharps Hospital San diego. Houston local doctors remove a boil on my back $260 but for cash $45. Dentists San diego all treatment less than half price just for having a $50 family discount ticket.(not insurance). I saved thousands off that ticket. Wife had a baby, $10,000, but we had no insurance so we paid $250, (some local tax on tobacco and booze paid the rest. I have heard some say health care in USA is far superior to the free one we have here in uk, WELL IT FRANKLY IS NOT, you have lawsuits over there in USA that prove that healthcare in UK is just as good as USA and its almost free here. True, non urgent things may require an appointment a few weeks forward but anything urgent is dealt with quickly. The ambulance service arrive within minutes of being called and they don't carry invoices or calculators for $2000 taxi ride to hospital! I think you should back your president, get almost free healthcare for all, get better pricing and everyone who works pays a little extra tax just as we do here in Europe, we call it National Insurance contributions, its about 5% of your capped earnings/wages, this covers not only health care but also sickness benefits, retirement pension, dental, optical, unemployment / disability benefit, child and workers tax credits Nobody is ever excluded and there is no CoPay either, They fix you no questions asked, a very comforting thought. Whoever heard of an insurance policy where you go to hospital and have to pay half the f***** bill as well? In the American System the employer pays insurance the employees pay too and then there is copay fees to pay too? who is getting all this money? where the heck is it going? at the prices they charge there should be no copay. For you die hards there is BUPA health insurance that UK has too but that is cheap, a fraction of the USA cost. OK Americans let me know your thoughts do you want an almost free healthcare for all in the USA, similar to UK? if you don't prove to me why your rip off system is better? your system benefits the rich and the scammer hospitals and insurance companies. SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT Arctic here is what a working person pays in the UK who earns 30k per year uk pounds Employer's NI 220.60 ($352.96) Employee's NI 189.58 ($303.32 Employee Tax 330.84 ($529.34) Total All Tax 741.02 Total Net Income 1,752.75 ($2804.40) So for $303.00 per month he is covered for all health costs entirely as well as dental, optical. This also covers retirement Pension currently 65 pounds per week ($104), sickness benefit, unemployment benefit, working tax credit and child tax credit, disability benefit. Our NHS get huge discounts off the drug companies and there is an NHS low cost rate for all Health service professionals, this is why health costs are so much cheaper here. Because USA system is dissected based on thousands of insurance company claims it is just a mire of administration and opportunities for these hospitals to overcharge. Why do you think drugs and medical care are so much cheaper elsewhere in the world? your politicians take bribes from these

Answer: Okay, that is well and good ideas. But tell me who is going to pay for it? The rich? No way, they have their pockets locked shut! The poor? No, they don't have the money, that's why we need it!...No, wait, there is another group that we can jump on...yes...the middle class, they can pay for it. Taxes will go up on everything. And what irks me is, if a couple can't afford 1 kid, why do they heve 4-5-6+ ? There is such a thing as birth control you know! So, now we have a hard working family with 2 kids (2 because they want to go places do things and save some money), They have a health care that they have to pay for every month, hundreds, sometimes up to $1,000 a month. They have co-pays, and have a co-pay for prescriptions, a mortgage, interest, property taxes (which part go to the welfare system already), babysitting fees if the mother works, and probably does. They don't qualify for anything free because they own a house, so any county/city benefits are not open to them. Then the family with 5+ kids who are getting: food stamps (till the kids turn 18 or move out), title 19 medical (until the kids turn 18 or move out), free dental, free babysitting (if they decide to go get a job), rent assistance, and many other things. If you add up all of what they get and reductions, they come close to what the other family is getting. And know what? These people are also living in the same areas as the other middle class people, but they are renting a house. But there are some who fall into the cracks, and those are the ones that concern me. But many of them could get a job if they want to. Yes it would be a chore to get it all straightened out, but is workable. But the old and infirmed, those are the ones that we should care for. They put their time in, and now they are treated badly with insurances. Enough rattling my cage.... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What I want to know is: if this is done, does that mean that the middle class family that has been paying ALL along for theirs, are they going to have to pay more??? Or will their amount be reduced to balance out everything? If you say that it would be according to money earned, then it better go the same for the rich and famous also. Actually I am in favor of it. But not if I have to pay out even more than I am now, for you see, I am of the middle class, and I pay property taxes, insurance, co-pays, and I am okay. But I know others aren't. I am sorry for them, but I didn't get anything handed to me, I had to work hard and long to get where I am, which to some people isn't very far. But I am relatively happy where I am. . aa

Question: Should my views be the new republican platform? I support unborn rights and would support a pro-life amendment to the constitution, with the only acceptation for the mother's life. I would abolish the department of education because it's a local and state level responsibility. I support the right to bear arms, concealed weapons licenses, hunting, stand your ground laws, etc. I support a 2 strikes and your out drunk driving law. I support a his body his choice law banning infant circumcision unless it is to treat a legitimate medical condition. I support the decriminalizing of marijuana because it is less harmful than alcohol. I think the drinking age should be 18 to match the age of adulthood. I think it is of the highest urgency to become and stay energy independent. I support nuclear power and increasing the number of nuclear power plants across America. I would push the auto makers to make electric cars available for drivers who want them. I would set and push for goals of energy independence, curing cancer, and paying down the nation debt. I oppose the endangered species act because it has failed to protect one species and has only given government control of people's land. I would raise the levels of fines on employers hiring illegal aliens. Homeland security should only be used as an anti-terror agency and criminal law enforcement should be handled by other agencies. I don't believe there is such thing as a gay marriage and think we should give them the same privileges that comes with marriage but call it something else. I think capitalism is the greatest antipoverty tool the world has ever seen and encourage the economy, not put outrageous taxes on it. I don't believe humans are warming up the Earth but I think we need to clean up some of the messes we are making such as air quality. I believe in a small federal government. I don't think the general public should even notice the federal government unless they visit their local military recruiter or post office. No more ethanol, it causes higher grocery bills and less MPG. I support Boone's plan. I support the rights of nudists to live their lifestyle on their privately owned property without the government telling them they must put clothes on. I am a Christian but don't think it's the government's job to push morality, I think morality must come from the people up. Not the government down. I support net neutrality, and oppose bandwidth caps. I would revert our copyright laws back to that of the Webster and Benjamin Franklin years: An item can be copyrighted for 14 years, renewable once, then falls into public domain. We allow men to go out in public shirtless. I support amending the law allowing both genders to do the same. One gender shirtless is discrimination. I support women's rights to breast feed in public. That is the function of the breast. I don't think anyone has ever been harmed for seeing a breast. I think smokers should be required to pay their own way when they get cancer and heart disease. Not get public money to fight a self imposed condition. I would allow people to own their social security accounts and allow them to invest in a Roth IRA within their social security account so the people may build a nest egg to retire on. Each person will own their account and congress may never dip into it. I would make it illegal for credit card companies to raise interest rates, at will, with no delinquent activity: banning universal default. Absolutely, no more national debt. No more borrowing. I believe terminally ill patients should be allowed to take experimental drugs that have yet to receive FDA approval. Lets get rid of the IRS, replace tax system with flat tax or national sales tax. The IRS and current tax code only exists to control people. I oppose taxes on broadband internet access, sales tax on in items bought online, and regulation of online content. I don't believe our government is up to the task of providing national heath care and it's much better off left in the hands of the private sector. I think daylight savings time should be expanded to a year round project. I oppose the government regulating the content of literature, films, video games, etc.

Answer: I really am not sure. I read your statement several times. I agree with you half the time. The other half I don't agree. But you are a little bit too far right on some things and a little too far left on others. But you aren't quite Centrist. You do however have many that would completely agree with you. But not Republicans or Democrats. You need to make a new party.

Question: What political catogory do I belong in? Republican? Democrat? Other? I support unborn rights and would support a pro-life amendment to the constitution, with the only acceptation for the mother's life. I would abolish the department of education because it's a local and state level responsibility. I support the right to bear arms, concealed weapons licenses, hunting, stand your ground laws, etc. I support a 2 strikes and your out drunk driving law. I support a his body his choice law banning infant circumcision unless it is to treat a legitimate medical condition. I support the decriminalizing of marijuana because it is less harmful than alcohol. I think the drinking age should be 18 to match the age of adulthood. I think it is of the highest urgency to become and stay energy independent. I support nuclear power and increasing the number of nuclear power plants across America. I would push the auto makers to make electric cars available for drivers who want them. I would set and push for goals of energy independence, curing cancer, and paying down the nation debt. I oppose the endangered species act because it has failed to protect one species and has only given government control of people's land. I would raise the levels of fines on employers hiring illegal aliens. I don't believe there is such thing as a gay marriage and think we should give them the same privileges that comes with marriage but call it something else. I think capitalism is the greatest antipoverty tool the world has ever seen and encourage the economy, not put outrageous taxes on it. I don't believe humans are warming up the Earth but I think we need to clean up some of the messes we are making such as air quality. I believe in a small federal government. I don't think the general public should even notice the federal government unless they visit their local military recruiter or post office. I support the rights of nudists to live their lifestyle on their privately owned property without the government telling them they must put clothes on. I am a Christian but don't think it's the government's job to push morality, I think morality must come from the people up. Not the government down. I support net neutrality, and oppose bandwidth caps. I would revert our copyright laws back to that of the Webster and Benjamin Franklin years: An item can be copyrighted for 14 years, renewable once, then falls into public domain. I think smokers should be required to pay their own way when they get cancer and heart disease. Not get public money to fight a self imposed condition. I would make it illegal for credit card companies to raise interest rates, at will, with no delinquent activity: banning universal default. I believe terminally ill patients should be allowed to take experimental drugs that have yet to receive FDA approval. I oppose taxes on broadband internet access, sales tax on in items bought online, and regulation of online content. I don't believe our government is up to the task of providing national heath care and it's much better off left in the hands of the private sector. I think daylight savings time should be expanded to a year round project. I oppose the government regulating the content of literature, films, video games, etc. So what am I? And how far our my beliefs from yours?

Answer: I think the closest thing, if you fall into any defined category at all, would be to call yourself a "Libertarian".

Question: How would you rank me politically? Democrat? Republican? Independent? Libertarian? I support unborn rights and would support a pro-life amendment to the constitution, with the only acceptation for the mother's life. I would abolish the department of education because it's a local and state level responsibility. I support the right to bear arms, concealed weapons licenses, hunting, stand your ground laws, etc. I support a 2 strikes and your out drunk driving law. I support a his body his choice law banning infant circumcision unless it is to treat a legitimate medical condition. I support the decriminalizing of marijuana because it is less harmful than alcohol. I think the drinking age should be 18 to match the age of adulthood. I think it is of the highest urgency to become and stay energy independent. I support nuclear power and increasing the number of nuclear power plants across America. I would push the auto makers to make electric cars available for drivers who want them. I would set and push for goals of energy independence, curing cancer, and paying down the nation debt. I oppose the endangered species act because it has failed to protect one species and has only given government control of people's land. I would raise the levels of fines on employers hiring illegal aliens. I don't believe there is such thing as a gay marriage and think we should give them the same privileges that comes with marriage but call it something else. I think capitalism is the greatest antipoverty tool the world has ever seen and encourage the economy, not put outrageous taxes on it. I don't believe humans are warming up the Earth but I think we need to clean up some of the messes we are making such as air quality. I believe in a small federal government. I don't think the general public should even notice the federal government unless they visit their local military recruiter or post office. I support the rights of nudists to live their lifestyle on their privately owned property without the government telling them they must put clothes on. I am a Christian but don't think it's the government's job to push morality, I think morality must come from the people up. Not the government down. I support net neutrality, and oppose bandwidth caps. I would revert our copyright laws back to that of the Webster and Benjamin Franklin years: An item can be copyrighted for 14 years, renewable once, then falls into public domain. I think smokers should be required to pay their own way when they get cancer and heart disease. Not get public money to fight a self imposed condition. I would make it illegal for credit card companies to raise interest rates, at will, with no delinquent activity: banning universal default. I believe terminally ill patients should be allowed to take experimental drugs that have yet to receive FDA approval. I oppose taxes on broadband internet access, sales tax on in items bought online, and regulation of online content. I don't believe our government is up to the task of providing national heath care and it's much better off left in the hands of the private sector. I think daylight savings time should be expanded to a year round project. I oppose the government regulating the content of literature, films, video games, etc. So what am I? And how far our my beliefs from yours?

Answer: A combination of Republican and libertarian. I am far to the left of you, and yet I also would support a pro-life amendment to the constitution if I were American. But I believe that you make too big a deal of circumcision. It's really no big deal for a baby boy, many consider it to be a protection against certain cancers, and if it is a family's religion to do it, then they should. (For a Jewish family it would be very offensive to their religion to prevent them from doing that to their male child.) I believe in universal health care paid by the public. Cigarettes and junk food could be very highly taxed to help pay for it. Drunk driving? One strike and you're out for a couple of years; two strikes and your out for ten years; three strikes and you're out for life. Humans are contributing to the global warming. We are certainly contributing to poisoning the atmosphere and the water. I agree with you about gay marriage. I strongly disagree with you about capitalism. It is an opportunity to abuse the poor. I have seen children who have grown up in absolutely deadly conditions because of the selfish capitalism of our North American textile companies and banana companies installed in Central America. I have wept with a teenage girl whose father had to give her up as a small child, along with her sisters, because he was only making $30 per week on banana plantations. I know of a woman working 12 hrs per day, six days per week, in a legal textile place, and yet still doesn't make enough money to feed her children. I have seen how thousands of other small children are living in the streets in horrendous conditions, because their parents can't afford to keep them. No, cruel, mindless, cold-hearted capitalism has no place in an advanced society. In America and in Canada there are some restrictions on it. In Canada we call it a mixed economy. But we are allowing our companies to abuse in other countries. We should forbid them to sell in our countries unless they can prove that they are treating their workers with dignity. If they were not in those countries, then the citizens could have the freedom to develope their own industries. But they monopolize the banana and textile industries, and with their money are able to buy the governments and do what they want.

Question: Help with Military Leave Laws!!? My husband is coming home in December for a year long tour in Iraq! I started a new job over a year ago and during my interview I made it clear that I would be wanting off for R & R and also time for when he was done with the tour! My job is now giving me trouble and not wanting to let me off. I do know that President Bush passed a new law in January 2008! I was just needing some clearity to see if I would be covered under this law! Or if there is anything that could cover me with my job. Anything would be greatful and oh so helpful! Thank you so very much. This is what the new law states....... The Family and Medical Leave Act and National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008On January 28, 2008, President Bush signed into law H.R. 4986, the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008 (NDAA), Pub. L. 110-181. Among other things, section 585 of the NDAA amends the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) to permit a "spouse, son, daughter, parent, or next of kin" to take up to 26 workweeks of leave to care for a "member of the Armed Forces, including a member of the National Guard or Reserves, who is undergoing medical treatment, recuperation, or therapy, is otherwise in outpatient status, or is otherwise on the temporary disability retired list, for a serious injury or illness."The provisions in the NDAA providing this leave are effective as of the date of the President's signing. The Department of Labor is working quickly to prepare more comprehensive guidance regarding rights and responsibilities under this new legislation. In the interim, WHD will require employers to act in good faith in providing leave under the new legislation. Because the NDAA amends the FMLA, FMLA-type procedures should be used as may be appropriate (for example, procedures regarding substitution of paid leave and notice). The NDAA also permits an employee to take FMLA leave for "any qualifying exigency (as the Secretary [of Labor] shall, by regulation, determine) arising out of the fact that the spouse, or a son, daughter, or parent of the employee is on active duty (or has been notified of an impending call or order to active duty) in the Armed Forces in support of a contingency operation." By its express terms, this provision of the NDAA is not effective until the Secretary of Labor issues final regulations defining "any qualifying exigency." DOL is expeditiously preparing such regulations. In the interim, DOL encourages employers to provide this type of leave to qualifying employees. DOL will update this page as additional guidance is developed and published. To view the amended Title I of the Family and Medical Leave Act:

Answer: I am a Military Reservist. You are out of luck on this one. Unless you had your employer give you written statements that they would give you time off there is nothing as of yet that dictates that they must give YOU time off for your spouses leave or R&R or return from overseas. You could try to get your spouses unit to call them and pressure them or even the call the local paper and tell them how your employer is not supporting you. But that is about it. There have been no new rules passed down (yet) on the new law that would dictate leave for any purpose other than injury or hospitalization.

Question: "Probable" Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Diagnosis? The doctors have diagnosed my wife with probable MS. They want to start her on beta-furon (sp?) after a week of being on prednisone. She's had a spinal tap (NOT good for my hands as she used me to hold on/squeeze for support, I tell ya!!), & we have a copy of the results. Of course, we can't figure out what the devil we're looking at. Here's what we have: A little over a year ago, my wife had an abnormal MRI while doing some brain functional MRI trials for $$$ ath one of the local universities. Her Dr's verified what the neurologist at the University said: The pattern seen in the MRI is the same pattern seen with MS. When they added the contrast & took the MRI, none of the lesions lit up (meaning none were active). Fast forward to now. 4 MRIs later, & no active lesions. Since the original MRI, a couple other very small lesions have shown up in her spine & brain, but none of them show up as active. She has noticed some bluriness in her left eye when she runs since last Mar/Apr 2009 that goes away within 10mins after she runs. She had a seizure about 8 months ago, & that seizure had the Dr's thinking it WASN'T MS, because seizures are usually very rarely seen/symptoms of MS. There is also slight tingling in both hands/arms that is noticed about once a week or less, so the combo of those 2 things had the Drs put her on anti seizure meds. Bloodwork has come up negative for everything under the sun: Lymes Disease Lead HIV Viruses other tests for diseases that can mimic MS I'll be at her Neurology appt nxt week for the diagnosis/prognosis. the Dr's think she'll be in the 30% category of patients who will maintain the level of function they currently have & not progressively get worse. So, is this "probable" MS legit? I've read a few places that since she is showing some very small outward signs/symptom coupled with the abnormal MRIs, that this is the actual diagnosis, NOT just the Drs saying "It's probably MS". But, I can't find anything on real sites (i.e.,National MS Society, Medical websites, etc). Does anyone REALLY know what the heck this is? I'm seeing my strong, intelligent wife trying to keep positive, but each day she is becoming more & more broken. Please, any help would be greatly appreciated. Forgot to add: She did get an evoke potential for the problem with her left eye & also saw the optometrist. EVP showed a problem with the right eye, not the left. The ophthalmologist said it sounded like optic neuritis, (more specifically Uhthoff phenomenon) & took a picture of the optic nerve of both eyes for comparison later. No abnormalities were observed, although he said that the patient will notice something wrong before the examination will show anything. In addition, she was in the Army for 12yrs as a vet tech, & then worked at the local animal shelter for a large municipality for 2yrs. Plus, her Mom has progressive MS & it deteriorated enough that she could no longer function & eventually died from MS complication.

Answer: Yes, it is a legitimate diagnosis. You are looking at the fact that chances are good that your wife has MS. If you want it in terms of medical jargon: Clinically probable MS involves- 1. relapsing/remitting symptoms with one neurological sign commonly associated with MS, OR 2. documented single episode with partial or complete recovery, with signs on examination of multifocal white matter disease and 3) no other explanation. The doctors you are dealing with sound very professional and trustworthy. They are also being exceptionally thorough and following the McDonald criteria, which is the protocol all dedicated physicians use in the determination of MS. I got the diagnosis of probable multiple sclerosis at the Cleveland Clinic, and it turned out that I have the disease. If it were less likely that your wife had MS, they would have given her a diagnosis of possible MS. You can take your neurologist's words at face value: According to the diagnosis your wife probably has MS. Many, many people get MRI results in the beginning indicating that they have no active lesions or no lesions at all, which simply means that their attack was brief or so slight that the lesions were too small to be able to be seen on the MRI Believe me, you can trust every word that comes out of your doctor's mouth. He is obviouly being exceptionally meticulous. Of course, your wife is depressed.

Question: Radical Islam always planning ahead.? In 2002, author Anis Shorrosh laid out what he said was radical Islam’s "Twenty Point Plan" for undermining America. See how many of thesesound familiar to you: 1. Terminate America’s freedom of speech by replacing it with statewide and nationwide hate-crime bills. 2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities who promote Islam as the religion of African-Americans while insisting Christianity is for whites only. What they fail to tell African-Americans is that it was Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves. In fact, the Arabic word for black and slave is the same, ’’Abed.’’ 3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith. 4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office to bring about favorable legislation toward Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting. 5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the Internet as possible by buying the related corporations or a controlling stock. 6. Yield to the fear of the imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America - black gold. America’s economy depends on oil and 41 percent of it comes from the Middle East. 7. Yell ’’foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran’’ anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena. 8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions and get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims as medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. (Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries need them more desperately than America?) Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way. 9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via: * Massive immigration (100, 000 annually since 1961). * Use no birth control whatsoever - every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later. * Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10, 000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years - since one can’t legally marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America. * Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants. (so far 2, 000 released inmates have joined al-Qaida worldwide). Only a few ’’sleeper cells’’ have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil. 10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1, 500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. 11. Provide very sizable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish ’’Centers for Islamic studies’’ with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher-education institutions. 12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, when in truth, Islam hijacked the terrorists. 13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards Muslims in America who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries. 14. Nullify America’s sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans with reports of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls. 15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not America’s justice system. 16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S., but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.(CAIR, FAIR, Holyland foundation) 17. Raise interest in Islam on America’s campuses by insisting freshman take at least one course on Islam. 'Five pillars of Islam' taught in public school http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52335 Where is the ACLU?? 18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by Internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media. 19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook. 20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the U.S. by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America.

Answer: Yes, and America must wake up and smell the jihad.

Question: Over precise conversation making me get short tempered? I have noticed that when I talk to certain people, that I have to be over-precise. It has led to me talking like I’m reading an extract out of a medical manual as a result. The kinds of people this problem has occurred with are... 1) Social services 2) Health and safety executive 3) National health services and similar bodies. In a case where someone needed to have 'on-call' staff support where someone would come out to help them; they would be told to call the emergency social services, which also never provided on-call services. When the person phoned the company and said "You said that if I am not satisfied with the company, you are to call, the on-call services", they said "No, that is not what I said; what I said was feel free to use emergency services on-call, if you are not satisfied with what you have". They said "Well, you know what I mean" and they said "No, I don't know what you mean". They had to be so precise about what they said to the other person said; that is just caused more confusion than it solved. They split hairs so much about what was said, and what the exact thing they wanted was; that the other person lost track of their own ability to construct a sensible comment and of what they meant. Why are they so incredibly pedantic about what was said? If I wanted to be precise enough, I could say that man never landed on the moon at all; because their bare foot never touched the actual lunar surface due to having a space suit on. It’s crazy. How can we communicate affectivity, or is it that their mental disability stops them from being precise and communicating properly with these people? How can I tell it is not a symptom of a brain defect? What is this about? I cannot get my brain to work like this either; it is like trying to make my brain function like a circuit board. Every time I come up against this problem, I end up getting so frustrated and start telling these people to F-off and get very angry. It is so debilitating, should I get medical help for this problem? When they make it so difficult to converse with them properly, I feel like literally smacking the living sh** out them! It is so awkward! CREED

Answer: I believe you mean "communicate effectively" and not "communicate affectively" fix your sentences and then someone may fix your problem.

Question: Being over precise with certain people in conversation? I have noticed that when I talk to certain people, that I have to be over-precise. It has led to me talking like I’m reading an extract out of a medical manual as a result. The kinds of people this problem has occurred with are... 1) Social services 2) Health and safety executive 3) National health services and similar bodies. In a case where someone needed to have 'on-call' staff support where someone would come out to help them; they would be told to call the emergency social services, which also never provided on-call services. When the person phoned the company and said "You said that if I am not satisfied with the company, you are to call, the on-call services", they said "No, that is not what I said; what I said was feel free to use emergency services on-call, if you are not satisfied with what you have". They said "Well, you know what I mean" and they said "No, I don't know what you mean". They had to be so precise about what they said to the other person said; that is just caused more confusion than it solved. They split hairs so much about what was said, and what the exact thing they wanted was; that the other person lost track of their own ability to construct a sensible comment and of what they meant. Why are they so incredibly pedantic about what was said? If I wanted to be precise enough, I could say that man never landed on the moon at all; because their bare foot never touched the actual lunar surface due to having a space suit on. It’s crazy. How can we communicate affectivity, or is it that their mental disability stops them from being precise and communicating properly with these people? How can I tell it is not a symptom of a brain defect? What is this about? I cannot get my brain to work like this either; it is like trying to make my brain function like a circuit board. Every time I come up against this problem, I end up getting so frustrated and start telling these people to F-off and get very angry. It is so debilitating, should I get medical help for this problem? When they make it so difficult to converse with them properly, I feel like literally smacking the living sh** out them! It is so awkward! CREED

Answer: I am so familiar with this. I say, at least, you've given them the benefit of the doubt by assuming that they have intelligence to understand the basics. But alas, some people just like to play games. I also believe someone must have commented on their lack of intelligence, thus the need to explain every last minute word in an explanation which I find to be condescending but that they feel is making them appear intelligent. We know what that means, lol. Your brain, like mine, assumes people understand simple messages. But, some, will waste time arguing about which word should come first in a sentence, when time is of the utmost. I would suggest just slowing it down for them in a non-defensive tone (not that you do). Sometimes, in my work, I will just say I am sorry (even if not my intent or true fault) and explain it very slowly..and people, just seem to accept this better. It is a kind of second chance to get them to understand in a different way (some people seem to need this). But, in a medical setting, it pays to make sure the message is understood. And, perhaps, restating it and then asking for their clarification will be necessary in the future to avoid any confusion. Sometimes, medical professionals are overwhelmed and it would also be easy to say after instructions, do you have any questions regarding the contact information I have given you? I hear ya though, many do have snotty attitudes. There is such pressure to be accurate, and legally so, that any statement becomes grounds for some type of debate. I would simply try to come back with manners. Excuse me, let me try to clarify that for you...Do you need me to confirm how the services work? I'd be happy to...and so on. Then, think your own thoughts when ya get home! I really think much has to do with the medical aspect. In the civilian world, it is more casual. Plus, like I mentioned, there are just those that want everything spelled out no matter what.

Question: Does Obama really expect us to believe his lies? Things Obama misrepresented: 1. Speaking to national audience, Obama said he voted against the war (or actually would have) and then voted to fund the war on several occasions when he actually could have voted against it. 2. Obama told the Sun-Times that Rezko raised between $50,000-60,000 during his political campaign; however, $168,000 has been traced to the indicted businessman/associates. http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/43... 3. Statements made regarding his real estate deals with lobbyist Tony Rezko, also his friend and fundraiser: "I don't recall exactly what our conversations were." Chicago-Tribune, Nov. 1, 2006 Four days later he told the Chicago Sun-Times (Nov. 5, 2006), ". . .to the best of my recollection, I told him about the property. . . " Obama told one newspaper he knew Rezko was under investigation at the time he entered into a real estate deal with him. But the Washington Post said Obama told him he had no idea he knew of Rezko's problems. ABC news found hundreds of stories in the Illinois newspaper about Rezko's problems in the preceding 5 months before the real estate deal that there were issues with Rezko, including an editorial. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxyPBmZE6... Last fall during a nationally televised presidential debate, Sen. Barack Obama hesitantly raised his hand and joined with most of his Democratic rivals to declare that he opposed decriminalizing marijuana. But as a candidate for the U.S. Senate four years ago, Mr. Obama told Illinois college students that he supported eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana use or possession, according to a videotape of a little noticed debate that was obtained by The Washington Times. 4. In a 2003 forum on health care, Mr. Obama said he supported the children of illegal aliens’ receiving the same benefits as citizens, “whether it’s medical, whether it’s in-state tuition.” Asked specifically whether he included “undocumented” people, Mr. Obama replied, “Absolutely.” But in a CNN debate Jan. 21, when Mr. Obama was asked whether his health care proposal covers illegal aliens, he said “no” and that he first wants to cover the U.S. citizens and legal residents without health care. 5. In 2004, Mr. Obama told an audience at Southern Illinois University, “I think it’s time for us to end the embargo with Cuba. … It’s time for us to acknowledge that that particular policy has failed.” However, he stopped short of calling for an end to the embargo in a Miami Herald op-ed in August. He said he would rely on diplomacy, with a message that if a post-Fidel Castro government made democratic changes, the U.S. “is prepared to take steps to normalize relations and ease the embargo.” 6. In an October 2003 NAACP debate, Mr. Obama said he would “vote to abolish” mandatory minimum sentences. “The mandatory minimums take too much discretion away from judges,” he said.

Answer: You're not going to convince an Obama supporter, they are like sheep being led to slaughter. Good news, we're not all idiots and know the truth!

Question: How would I be categorized politically? I support unborn rights and would support a pro-life amendment to the constitution, with the only acceptation for the mother's life. I would abolish the department of education because it's a local and state level responsibility. I support the right to bear arms, concealed weapons licenses, hunting, stand your ground laws, etc. I support a 2 strikes and your out drunk driving law. I support a his body his choice law banning infant circumcision unless it is to treat a legitimate medical condition. I support the decriminalizing of marijuana because it is less harmful than alcohol. I think the drinking age should be 18 to match the age of adulthood. I think it is of the highest urgency to become and stay energy independent. I support nuclear power and increasing the number of nuclear power plants across America. I would push the auto makers to make electric cars available for drivers who want them. I would set and push for goals of energy independence, curing cancer, and paying down the nation debt. I oppose the endangered species act because it has failed to protect one species and has only given government control of people's land. I would raise the levels of fines on employers hiring illegal aliens. Homeland security should only be used as an anti-terror agency and criminal law enforcement should be handled by other agencies. I don't believe there is such thing as a gay marriage and think we should give them the same privileges that comes with marriage but call it something else. I think capitalism is the greatest antipoverty tool the world has ever seen and encourage the economy, not put outrageous taxes on it. I don't believe humans are warming up the Earth but I think we need to clean up some of the messes we are making such as air quality. I believe in a small federal government. I don't think the general public should even notice the federal government unless they visit their local military recruiter or post office. No more ethanol, it causes higher grocery bills and less MPG. I support Boone's plan. I support the rights of nudists to live their lifestyle on their privately owned property without the government telling them they must put clothes on. I am a Christian but don't think it's the government's job to push morality, I think morality must come from the people up. Not the government down. I support net neutrality, and oppose bandwidth caps. I would revert our copyright laws back to that of the Webster and Benjamin Franklin years: An item can be copyrighted for 14 years, renewable once, then falls into public domain. We allow men to go out in public shirtless. I support amending the law allowing both genders to do the same. One gender shirtless is discrimination. I support women's rights to breast feed in public. That is the function of the breast. I don't think anyone has ever been harmed for seeing a breast. I think smokers should be required to pay their own way when they get cancer and heart disease. Not get public money to fight a self imposed condition. I would allow people to own their social security accounts and allow them to invest in a Roth IRA within their social security account so the people may build a nest egg to retire on. Each person will own their account and congress may never dip into it. I would make it illegal for credit card companies to raise interest rates, at will, with no delinquent activity: banning universal default. Absolutely, no more national debt. No more borrowing. After a natural disaster, no funds should be given by the federal government to rebuild private property, only that which was owned by the public. Schools, highways, libraries, city halls, may be rebuilt by the taxpayer but not people's privately owned property. It's not our problem if they don't insure their property. I oppose bailouts of the private sector. If banks want to make bad loans to people who they know can't afford to pay them back, so be it. They will have to own their misbehavior. Not the taxpayer. I believe terminally ill patients should be allowed to take experimental drugs that have yet to receive FDA approval. Lets get rid of the IRS, replace tax system with flat tax or national sales tax. The IRS and current tax code only exists to control people. I oppose taxes on broadband internet access, sales tax on in items bought online, and regulation of online content. I don't believe our government is up to the task of providing national heath care and it's much better off left in the hands of the private sector. I think adults should legally be able to take steroids for body building if he is not competing in competitive sports. I think daylight savings time should be expanded to a year round project. I oppose the government regulating the content of literature, films, video games, etc.

Answer: Conservative...inbetween libertarian and republican.

Question: How would I be categorized politically? ? I support unborn rights and would support a pro-life amendment to the constitution, with the only acceptation for the mother's life. I would abolish the department of education because it's a local and state level responsibility. I support the right to bear arms, concealed weapons licenses, hunting, stand your ground laws, etc. I support a 2 strikes and your out drunk driving law. I support a his body his choice law banning infant circumcision unless it is to treat a legitimate medical condition. I support the decriminalizing of marijuana because it is less harmful than alcohol. I think the drinking age should be 18 to match the age of adulthood. I think it is of the highest urgency to become and stay energy independent. I support nuclear power and increasing the number of nuclear power plants across America. I would push the auto makers to make electric cars available for drivers who want them. I would set and push for goals of energy independence, curing cancer, and paying down the nation debt. I oppose the endangered species act because it has failed to protect one species and has only given government control of people's land. I would raise the levels of fines on employers hiring illegal aliens. Homeland security should only be used as an anti-terror agency and criminal law enforcement should be handled by other agencies. I don't believe there is such thing as a gay marriage and think we should give them the same privileges that comes with marriage but call it something else. I think capitalism is the greatest antipoverty tool the world has ever seen and encourage the economy, not put outrageous taxes on it. I don't believe humans are warming up the Earth but I think we need to clean up some of the messes we are making such as air quality. I believe in a small federal government. I don't think the general public should even notice the federal government unless they visit their local military recruiter or post office. No more ethanol, it causes higher grocery bills and less MPG. I support Boone's plan. I support the rights of nudists to live their lifestyle on their privately owned property without the government telling them they must put clothes on. I am a Christian but don't think it's the government's job to push morality, I think morality must come from the people up. Not the government down. I support net neutrality, and oppose bandwidth caps. I would revert our copyright laws back to that of the Webster and Benjamin Franklin years: An item can be copyrighted for 14 years, renewable once, then falls into public domain. We allow men to go out in public shirtless. I support amending the law allowing both genders to do the same. One gender shirtless is discrimination. I support women's rights to breast feed in public. That is the function of the breast. I don't think anyone has ever been harmed for seeing a breast. I think smokers should be required to pay their own way when they get cancer and heart disease. Not get public money to fight a self imposed condition. I would allow people to own their social security accounts and allow them to invest in a Roth IRA within their social security account so the people may build a nest egg to retire on. Each person will own their account and congress may never dip into it. I would make it illegal for credit card companies to raise interest rates, at will, with no delinquent activity: banning universal default. Absolutely, no more national debt. No more borrowing. After a natural disaster, no funds should be given by the federal government to rebuild private property, only that which was owned by the public. Schools, highways, libraries, city halls, may be rebuilt by the taxpayer but not people's privately owned property. It's not our problem if they don't insure their property. I oppose bailouts of the private sector. If banks want to make bad loans to people who they know can't afford to pay them back, so be it. They will have to own their misbehavior. Not the taxpayer. I believe terminally ill patients should be allowed to take experimental drugs that have yet to receive FDA approval. Lets get rid of the IRS, replace tax system with flat tax or national sales tax. The IRS and current tax code only exists to control people. I oppose taxes on broadband internet access, sales tax on in items bought online, and regulation of online content. I don't believe our government is up to the task of providing national heath care and it's much better off left in the hands of the private sector. I think adults should legally be able to take steroids for body building if he is not competing in competitive sports. I think daylight savings time should be expanded to a year round project. I oppose the government regulating the content of literature, films, video games, etc.

Answer: Republican